Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23538511›Full record

ReviewBiomatter

Enhancing retention and efficacy of cardiosphere-derived cells administered after myocardial infarction using a hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogel.

Rachel Ruckdeschel Smith, Eduardo Marbán, Linda Marbán

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomatter. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Application of Porous Scaffolds for Cardiovascular Tissues.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Advances in stem cell therapy for cardiovascular disease (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2016
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Immunobiology of fibrin-based engineered heart tissue.Stem cells translational medicine · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel Ruckdeschel SmithCapricor Inc.; 8700 Beverly Boulevard; Los Angeles, CA USA.
Eduardo MarbánCedars-Sinai Heart Institute; Los Angeles, CA USA.
Linda MarbánCapricor Inc.; 8700 Beverly Boulevard; Los Angeles, CA USA.
Capricor Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) are under clinical development and are currently being tested in a clinical trial enrolling patients who have undergone a myocardial infarction. CDCs are presently administered via infusion into the infarct-related artery and have been shown in early clinical trials to be effective agents of myocardial regeneration. This review describes the administration of CDCs in a hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogel via myocardial injection and the subsequent improvements in therapeutic benefit seen in animal models. Development of a next generation therapy involving the combination of CDCs and hydrogel is discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyClinical Trials as TopicGelatinHumansHyaluronic AcidHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMyocardial InfarctionMyocytes, CardiacGelatinHyaluronic AcidHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateALLSTAR trialCADUCEUS trialcardiosphere-derived cellshyaluronan-gelatin hydrogelmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID23538511
PMCPMC3732325
OpenAlexW2000920295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.