Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23536534›Full record

ReviewOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2013

Panel 6: Vaccines.

Stephen I Pelton, Melinda M Pettigrew, Stephen J Barenkamp, Fabrice Godfroid, Carlos G Grijalva, Amanda Leach, Janak Patel, Timothy F Murphy, Sanja Selak, Lauren O Bakaletz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Editorial: Otitis media.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Panel 6: Vaccines.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vaccines for Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae: the Future Is Now.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Update on otitis media - prevention and treatment.Infection and drug resistance · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Stephen I PeltonBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. spelton@bu.edu
Melinda M Pettigrew
Stephen J Barenkamp
Fabrice Godfroid
Carlos G Grijalva
Amanda Leach
Janak Patel
Timothy F Murphy
Sanja Selak
Lauren O Bakaletz
Boston University · USGlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEIntercell (Austria) · ATMenzies School of Health Research · AUSaint Louis University · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USYale New Haven Health System · US

Funding

Development of a vaccine for prevention of Haemophilus influenzae otitis mediaR01AI081887 · NIAID · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI BARENKAMP, STEPHEN J. · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
10th International Post-Symposium Research Conference on Recent Advances in OtitiR13DC011455 · NIDCD · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI BAKALETZ, LAUREN O, CASSELBRANT, MARGARETHA LINNEA · 2011 to 2011
$40k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI081887NIDCD NIH HHS R13 DC011455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo update progress on the effectiveness of vaccine for prevention of acute otitis media (AOM) and identification of promising candidate antigens against Streptococcus pneumoniae, nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. REVIEW

methodsLiterature searches were performed in OvidSP and PubMed restricted to articles published between June 2007 and September 2011. Search terms included otitis media, vaccines, vaccine antigens, and each of the otitis pathogens and candidate antigens identified in the ninth conference report.

conclusionsThe current report provides further evidence for the effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) in the prevention of otitis media. Observational studies demonstrate a greater decline in AOM episodes than reported in clinical efficacy trials. Unmet challenges include extending protection to additional serotypes and additional pathogens, the need to prevent early episodes, the development of correlates of protection for protein antigens, and the need to define where an otitis media vaccine strategy fits with priorities for child health. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Acute otitis media continues to be a burden on children and families, especially those who suffer from frequent recurrences. The 7-valent PCV (PCV7) has reduced the burden of disease as well as shifted the pneumococcal serotypes and the distribution of otopathogens currently reported in children with AOM. Antibiotic resistance remains an ongoing challenge. Multiple candidate antigens have demonstrated the necessary requirements of conservation, surface exposure, immunogenicity, and protection in animal models. Further research on the role of each antigen in pathogenesis, in the development of correlates of protection in animal models, and in new adjuvants to elicit responses in the youngest infants is likely to be productive and permit more antigens to move into human clinical trials.

Indexed as

Bacterial VaccinesEvidence-Based MedicineHaemophilus influenzaeHumansMoraxella catarrhalisOtitis MediaPneumococcal VaccinesStreptococcus pneumoniaeTreatment OutcomeVaccines, ConjugateBacterial VaccinesPneumococcal VaccinesVaccines, Conjugate

Identifiers

PMID23536534
PMCPMC4029613
OpenAlexW1979454760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.