ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
Development of a singleplex PCR assay for rapid identification and differentiation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii, Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans, Cryptococcus gattii, and hybrids.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geographical distribution of Cryptococcus neoformans in Iran, pathogenic factors, and antifungal susceptibility profile.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Approach to Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Hosts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Antifungal and antibiofilm effect of duloxetine hydrochloride against Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii.Folia microbiologica · 2024Article
- Distribution and Polymorphisms of Group I Introns in Mitochondrial Genes fromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Phenotypic Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Article
- Multicenter Evaluation of BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel for Detection of Bacteria, Viruses, and Yeast in Cerebrospinal Fluid Specimens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Cryptococcus neoformans meningoencephalitis in a patient with polyarteritis nodosa.Folia microbiologica · 2014Article
- Cryptococcus gattii infections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014Review
- Development of two molecular approaches for differentiation of clinically relevant yeast species closely related to Candida guilliermondii and Candida famata.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Update on fungal diagnostics.Current infectious disease reports · 2014Article
- Identification and differentiation of Candida parapsilosis complex species by use of exon-primed intron-crossing PCR.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Performance of two MALDI-TOF MS systems for the identification of yeasts isolated from bloodstream infections and cerebrospinal fluids using a time-saving direct transfer protocol.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2014Article
- Skeletal cryptococcosis from 1977 to 2013.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014Review
- Rapid differentiation of cryptic species within Cryptococcus gattii by a duplex PCR assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A singleplex PCR assay using a single primer pair targeting the putative sugar transporter gene was developed here to distinguish Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii, Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans, and Cryptococcus gattii according to the distinct size of the amplicon. The interspecies and intravarietal hybrids were also characterized on the basis of distinct combined profiles of amplicons. This PCR assay is a rapid, simple, and reliable approach suitable for laboratory diagnoses and large-scale epidemiologic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.