Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23536397›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Absence of Mycobacterium intracellulare and presence of Mycobacterium chimaera in household water and biofilm samples of patients in the United States with Mycobacterium avium complex respiratory disease.

Richard J Wallace, Elena Iakhiaeva, Myra D Williams, Barbara A Brown-Elliott, Sruthi Vasireddy, Ravikiran Vasireddy, Leah Lande, Donald D Peterson, Janet Sawicki, Rebecca Kwait and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spinal infections.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Isolation and identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria from aquarium fish in Ilam, Iran.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The State-of-the-Art ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biofilm prevention concentration of clarithromycin against clinically relevant species of nontuberculous mycobacteria.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Polish journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Patients with Pulmonary Diseases in Gyeongnam, Korea, Using Multiplex PCR and Multigene Sequence-Based Analysis.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard J WallaceMycobacteria/Nocardia Research Laboratory, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA. richard.wallace@uthct.edu
Elena Iakhiaeva
Myra D Williams
Barbara A Brown-Elliott
Sruthi Vasireddy
Ravikiran Vasireddy
Leah Lande
Donald D Peterson
Janet Sawicki
Rebecca Kwait
Wellington S Tichenor
Christine Turenne
Joseph O Falkinham
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler · USLankenau Medical Center · USVirginia Tech · USLankenau Institute for Medical Research · USSaskatchewan Disease Control Laboratory · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that respiratory isolates from pulmonary disease patients and household water/biofilm isolates of Mycobacterium avium could be matched by DNA fingerprinting. To determine if this is true for Mycobacterium intracellulare, household water sources for 36 patients with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease were evaluated. MAC household water isolates from three published studies that included 37 additional MAC respiratory disease patients were also evaluated. Species identification was done initially using nonsequencing methods with confirmation by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and/or partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. M. intracellulare was identified by nonsequencing methods in 54 respiratory cultures and 41 household water/biofilm samples. By ITS sequencing, 49 (90.7%) respiratory isolates were M. intracellulare and 4 (7.4%) were Mycobacterium chimaera. In contrast, 30 (73%) household water samples were M. chimaera, 8 (20%) were other MAC X species (i.e., isolates positive with a MAC probe but negative with species-specific M. avium and M. intracellulare probes), and 3 (7%) were M. avium; none were M. intracellulare. In comparison, M. avium was recovered from 141 water/biofilm samples. These results indicate that M. intracellulare lung disease in the United States is acquired from environmental sources other than household water. Nonsequencing methods for identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria (including those of the MAC) might fail to distinguish closely related species (such as M. intracellulare and M. chimaera). This is the first report of M. chimaera recovery from household water. The study underscores the importance of taxonomy and distinguishing the many species and subspecies of the MAC.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyBiofilmsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFamily CharacteristicsHumansMycobacterium avium ComplexRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNATuberculosis, PulmonaryDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID23536397
PMCPMC3716115
OpenAlexW1985135296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.