Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23536140›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2013

Rapid HIV testing for individuals on probation/parole: outcomes of an intervention trial.

Michael S Gordon, Timothy W Kinlock, Michelle McKenzie, Monique E Wilson, Josiah D Rich

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The effect of a local change team intervention on staff attitudes towards HIV service delivery in correctional settings: a randomized trial.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2014
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Psychiatric Disorders and HIV Drug Risk Behaviors Among Individuals Under Community Correctional Supervision.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael S GordonFriends Research Institute, Inc., 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. mgordon@friendsresearch.org
Timothy W Kinlock
Michelle McKenzie
Monique E Wilson
Josiah D Rich
Friends Research Institute · USMiriam Hospital · US

Funding

Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI LARRY K BROWN · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
A Randomized Controlled Trial and Cohort Study of HIV Testing and Linkage to CareR01DA030771 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI GORDON, MICHAEL SCOTT, RICH, JOSIAH D · 2010 to 2015
$3.3M
Methadone Maintenance for PrisonersR01DA016237 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI KINLOCK, TIMOTHY W · 2003 to 2007
$2.9M
Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient Oriented ResearchK24DA022112 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI RICH, JOSIAH D · 2008 to 2017
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NIAID NIH HHS P30AI042853NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA022112NIDA NIH HHS K24DA022112NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016237NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030771NIDA NIH HHS R01DA030771NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 16237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many probationers and parolees do not receive HIV testing despite being at increased risk for obtaining and transmitting HIV. A two-group randomized controlled trial was conducted between April, 2011 and May, 2012 at probation/parole offices in Baltimore, Maryland and Providence/Pawtucket, Rhode Island. Male and female probationers/parolees were interviewed (n = 1,263) and then offered HIV testing based on random assignment to one of two conditions: (1) On-site rapid HIV testing conducted at the probation/parole office; or (2) Referral for rapid HIV testing off site at a community HIV testing clinic. Outcomes were: (1) undergoing HIV testing; and (2) receipt of HIV testing results. Participants were significantly more likely to be tested on-site at a probation/parole office versus off-site at a HIV testing clinic (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of receiving HIV testing results. Findings indicate that probationers/parolees are willing to be tested on-site and, independent of testing location, are equally willing to receive their results. Implications for expanding rapid HIV testing to more criminal justice related locations and populations are discussed.

Indexed as

PrisonersAdultAIDS SerodiagnosisBaltimoreCriminal LawFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareRhode Island

Identifiers

PMID23536140
PMCPMC3674156
OpenAlexW1981673021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.