Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23536120›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2013

Exposure to pro-smoking media in college students: does type of media channel differentially contribute to smoking risk?

William G Shadel, Steven C Martino, Claude Setodji, Deborah Scharf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review on the impact of point-of-sale tobacco promotion on smoking.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of antismoking media on college students' smoking-related beliefs and intentions.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Global Evidence on the Association between POS Advertising Bans and Youth Smoking Participation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  14. Quantifying the persistence of pro-smoking media effects on college students' smoking risk.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2014
    Article
  15. Middle and high school students' exposure to alcohol- and smoking-related media: a pilot study using ecological momentary assessment.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William G ShadelRAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. shadel@rand.org
Steven C Martino
Claude Setodji
Deborah Scharf

Funding

In Vivo Assessment of Young Adults' Exposure to Cigarette AdvertisingR21CA137286 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI SHADEL, WILLIAM G · 2009 to 2010
$421k
NCI NIH HHS R21CA1237286NCI NIH HHS R21 CA137286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are almost no data on whether the different channels through which pro-smoking media appear (i.e., point-of-sale advertising, movie smoking) differently influence smoking. PURPOSE: This study used ecological momentary assessment to examine whether differences in smoking risk were observed for exposures to different pro-smoking media channels.

methodsCollege students (n = 134) carried smartphones for 21 days, recording their exposures to pro-smoking media and the media channels for that exposure and responding to three randomly issued control prompts per day. Participants answered questions about their future smoking risk after each pro-smoking media exposure and random prompt.

resultsParticipants had elevated future smoking risk following exposure to pro-smoking media at point of sale (p < 0.001); smoking risk at times of exposure to smoking in movies did not differ from risk measured during control prompts (p = 0.78).

conclusionsThere is merit to examining the relative contribution of different pro-smoking media channels to smoking behavior.

Indexed as

Mass MediaCell PhoneComputers, HandheldFemaleHumansMaleRiskSmokingStudentsUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23536120
PMCPMC3644016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.