Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23536072›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Engineered deafness reveals that mouse courtship vocalizations do not require auditory experience.

Elena J Mahrt, David J Perkel, Ling Tong, Edwin W Rubel, Christine V Portfors

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vocal recognition of partners by female prairie voles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bats possess the anatomical substrate for a laryngeal motor cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena J MahrtSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Vancouver, Washington 98686, USA.
David J Perkel
Ling Tong
Edwin W Rubel
Christine V Portfors
Merrill (United States) · USWashington State University Vancouver · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESEARCH CORE CENTERP30DC004661 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W, STONE, JENNIFER S. · 2000 to 2014
$11.1M
Motley Diversity SupplementR01DC003829 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RUBEL, EDWIN W · 1999 to 2014
$6.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC03829NIDCD NIH HHS DC04661NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004661NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory experience during development is necessary for normal language acquisition in humans. Although songbirds, some cetaceans, and maybe bats may also be vocal learners, vocal learning has yet to be well established for a laboratory mammal. Mice are potentially an excellent model organism for studying mechanisms underlying vocal communication. Mice vocalize in different social contexts, yet whether they learn their vocalizations remains unresolved. To address this question, we compared ultrasonic courtship vocalizations emitted by chronically deaf and normal hearing adult male mice. We deafened CBA/CaJ male mice, engineered to express diphtheria toxin (DT) receptors in hair cells, by systemic injection of DT at postnatal day 2 (P2). By P9, almost all inner hair cells were absent and by P16 all inner and outer hair cells were absent in DTR mice. These mice did not show any auditory brainstem responses as adults. Wild-type littermates, also treated with DT at P2, had normal hair cells and normal auditory brainstem responses. We compared the temporal structure of vocalization bouts, the types of vocalizations, the patterns of syllables, and the acoustic features of each syllable type emitted by hearing and deaf males in the presence of a female. We found that almost all of the vocalization features we examined were similar in hearing and deaf animals. These findings indicate that mice do not need auditory experience during development to produce normal ultrasonic vocalizations in adulthood. We conclude that mouse courtship vocalizations are not acquired through auditory feedback-dependent learning.

Indexed as

AcousticsAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAnimals, NewbornDeafnessDiphtheria ToxinEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHearing Loss, SensorineuralHeparin-binding EGF-like Growth FactorHomeodomain ProteinsHumansIndolesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMiceDAPIDiphtheria ToxinHBEGF protein, humanHbegf protein, mouseHeparin-binding EGF-like Growth FactorHomeodomain ProteinsIndolesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPou4f3 protein, mouseSox2 protein, mouseSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTranscription Factor Brn-3C

Identifiers

PMID23536072
PMCPMC3691057
OpenAlexW2077842744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.