ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013
Variability of human corticospinal excitability tracks the state of action preparation.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does sonification of action simulation training impact corticospinal excitability and audiomotor plasticity?Experimental brain research · 2021Trial
- Premovement Suppression of Corticospinal Excitability Is Modulated by Reaction Time Task Requirements.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Effects of Incremental Mechanical Load on Readiness Potential Amplitude During Voluntary Movement.NeuroSci · 2026Article
- Trial-By-Trial Variation In Upper Extremity Movement Smoothness After Acute Stroke Relates To Clinical Assessments And Corticospinal Tract Injury.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2025Article
- Preparing to act follows Bayesian inference rules.iScience · 2025Article
- Article
- Increased sensorimotor noise in Tourette syndrome.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation: interpreting a simple measure of a complex system.The Journal of physiology · 2023Review
- Action Selection and Motor Decision Making: Insights from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Confidence modulates the decodability of scene prediction during partially-observable maze exploration in humans.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Proactive inhibition is marked by differences in the pattern of motor cortex activity during movement preparation and execution.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- On the variability of motor-evoked potentials: experimental results and mathematical model.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Influence of post-stroke fatigue on reaction times and corticospinal excitability during movement preparation.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021Observational
- A framework to assess the impact of number of trials on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Motor Cortex Activity Influences Visual Awareness Judgments.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Music Form but Not Music Experience Modulates Motor Cortical Activity in Response to Novel Music.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Motor Cortex Excitability Reflects the Subjective Value of Reward and Mediates Its Effects on Incentive-Motivated Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Fluctuations in Human Corticospinal Activity Prior to Grasp.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2019Article
- Motor Preparation for Action Inhibition: A Review of Single Pulse TMS Studies Using the Go/NoGo Paradigm.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Task-evoked trial-by-trial variability is a ubiquitous property of neural responses, yet its functional role remains largely unclear. Recent work in nonhuman primates shows that the temporal structure of neural variability in several brain regions is task-related. For example, trial-by-trial variability in premotor cortex tracks motor preparation with increasingly consistent firing rates and thus a decline in variability before movement onset. However, whether noninvasive measures of the variability of population activity available from humans can similarly track the preparation of actions remains unknown. We tested this by using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary motor cortex (M1) to measure corticospinal excitability (CSE) at different times during action preparation. First, we established the basic properties of intrinsic CSE variability at rest. Then, during the task, responses (left or right button presses) were either directly instructed (forced choice) or resulted from a value decision (choice). Before movement onset, we observed a temporally specific task-related decline in CSE variability contralateral to the responding hand. This decline was stronger in fast-response compared with slow-response trials, consistent with data in nonhuman primates. For the nonresponding hand, CSE variability also decreased, but only in choice trials, and earlier compared with the responding hand, possibly reflecting choice-specific suppression of unselected actions. These findings suggest that human CSE variability measured by TMS over M1 tracks the state of motor preparation, and may reflect the optimization of preparatory population activity. This provides novel avenues in humans to assess the dynamics of action preparation but also more complex processes, such as choice-to-action transformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.