Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23536018›Full record

Observational studyWiener klinische Wochenschrift2013

Experience with lenalidomide in an Austrian non-study population with advanced myelofibrosis.

Sonja Burgstaller, Michael Fridrik, Sabine Hojas, Thomas Kühr, Heinz Ludwig, Beate Mayrbäurl, Rainer Pöhnl, Michael Pötscher, Ernst Schlögl, Daniela Zauner and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sonja BurgstallerInnere Medizin IV, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Grieskirchnerstraße 42, 4600 Wels, Austria. sonja.burgstaller@klinikum-wegr.at
Michael Fridrik
Sabine Hojas
Thomas Kühr
Heinz Ludwig
Beate Mayrbäurl
Rainer Pöhnl
Michael Pötscher
Ernst Schlögl
Daniela Zauner
Josef Thaler
Heinz Gisslinger
Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen · ATBarmherzige Schwestern vom heiligen Kreuz · ATHanusch Hospital · ATKaiser-Franz-Josef-Spital · ATLKH Hochsteiermark · ATWilhelminen Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current literature provides conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with MF treated within a named patient program in Austria. A total of 22 patients with MF were treated with lenalidomide in 7 different centres throughout Austria. Median age of patients was 68 years. Primary MF was present in 13 patients. Eight patients had post-polycythemia vera (post-PV) and 1 post-essential thrombocythemia (post-ET) MF. According to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS), all patients were scored within the intermediate-2 or high-risk group. Approximately one-third of patients were treated with 2 or more prior therapies. The overall response rate according to International Working Group (IWG) criteria was 12.5 %. Efficacy of lenalidomide was moderate in this non-study patient population. Limiting factors seemed to be stage of disease and risk profile of patients included in this analysis.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnemiaAustriaDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsLenalidomideLeukopeniaMaleMiddle AgedPrimary MyelofibrosisThalidomideThrombocytopeniaTreatment OutcomeImmunologic FactorsLenalidomideThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID23536018
OpenAlexW72531553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.