Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23534701›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2013

Long-term in vivo imaging of viscoelastic properties of the mouse brain after controlled cortical impact.

Thomas Boulet, Matthew L Kelso, Shadi F Othman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Mechanosensation in traumatic brain injury.Neurobiology of disease · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pre-clinical MR elastography: Principles, techniques, and applications.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Traumatic brain injury using mouse models.Translational stroke research · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas BouletDepartment of Engineering Mechanics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraksa 43353, USA.
Matthew L Kelso
Shadi F Othman
Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

TARGETED NANOCARRIER FOR SIRNA DELIVERY TO TUMOR VASCULATUREP20RR021937 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KABANOV, ALEXANDER V · 2008 to 2011
$8.6M
NCRR NIH HHS RR021937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents a variety of causes and symptoms, thus making the development of reliable diagnostic methods and therapeutic treatments challenging. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a technique that allows for a noninvasive assessment of the mechanical properties of soft biological tissue, such as tissue stiffness, storage modulus, and loss modulus. Importantly, by quantifying the changes in the stiffness of tissue that is often associated with disease, MRE is able to detect tissue pathologies at early stages. Recent improvements in instrumentation have allowed for the investigation of small samples with microscopic resolution (μMRE). We hypothesize that μMRE can sensitively detect variations in micromechanical properties in the brain caused by the compressive and shearing forces sustained during TBI. To test this hypothesis, we randomized 13 C57BL mice to receive a controlled cortical impact at a 0.5 mm or 0.75 mm depth, with both sham and naïve mice as controls. Our objective was to propagate mechanical shear waves throughout the brain for in vivo TBI μMRE imaging. The mechanical properties of the injured brain tissue were determined at days 0, 1, 7, and 28 post-injury. For both groups, we observed a significant drop in the stiffness of the impacted region immediately following the injury; the 0.75 mm animals experienced increased tissue softness that lasted longer than that for the 0.5 mm group. Although the shear stiffness, storage modulus, and loss modulus parameters all followed the same trend, the tissue stiffness yielded the most statistically significant results. Overall, this article introduces a transformative technique for mechanically mapping the brain and detecting brain diseases and injury.

Indexed as

ElasticityAnimalsBrain InjuriesCerebral CortexElasticity Imaging TechniquesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRandom AllocationTime FactorsViscosity

Identifiers

PMID23534701
PMCPMC3751490
OpenAlexW1983588579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.