Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23533758›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis international2013

Measuring the quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis in clinical practice: a necessary challenge.

Karine Baumstarck, Laurent Boyer, Mohamed Boucekine, Pierre Michel, Jean Pelletier, Pascal Auquier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Quality of Life, Self-Reported Cognitive Difficulties, and Performance-Based Cognitive Problems in Multiple Sclerosis: What's Sleep Got to Do With It?Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Consensus quality indicators for monitoring multiple sclerosis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Quality of Life and Medication Adherence in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis-Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karine BaumstarckEA3279, Self-Perceived Health Assessment Research Unit, School of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Laurent Boyer
Mohamed Boucekine
Pierre Michel
Jean Pelletier
Pascal Auquier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the physical disability aspect of multiple sclerosis (MS) is of great importance, quality of life (QoL) measurements are being considered increasingly important with regard to evaluating disease progression, treatment, and the management of care provided to MS patients. Despite the acknowledged need to consider QoL issues, QoL assessment remains underutilized in clinical practice. These issues should be explored and understood to promote the use of measuring QoL in MS clinical practice. We explore the difficulties for clinicians: choosing and determining the most appropriate QoL measure and how to best integrate QoL measurements into clinical practice. This paper discusses several avenues to provide to clinicians arguments of the clinical relevance and accuracy of QoL instruments and ultimately to enhance the use of QoL measures in clinical practice for MS patients.

Identifiers

PMID23533758
PMCPMC3603557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.