Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23533608›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Derivation and expansion using only small molecules of human neural progenitors for neurodegenerative disease modeling.

Peter Reinhardt, Michael Glatza, Kathrin Hemmer, Yaroslav Tsytsyura, Cora S Thiel, Susanne Höing, Sören Moritz, Juan A Parga, Lydia Wagner, Jan M Bruder and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 278 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
278citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

278 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 468 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

218 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter ReinhardtDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Münster, North Rhine Westphalia, Germany.
Michael Glatza
Kathrin Hemmer
Yaroslav Tsytsyura
Cora S Thiel
Susanne Höing
Sören Moritz
Juan A Parga
Lydia Wagner
Jan M Bruder
Guangming Wu
Benjamin Schmid
Albrecht Röpke
Jürgen Klingauf
Jens C Schwamborn
Thomas Gasser
Hans R Schöler
Jared Sterneckert
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine · DEUniversity of Münster · DECenter for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases · ESHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic drug discovery requires billions of cells for high-throughput screening (HTS) campaigns. Because up to several million different small molecules will be tested in a single HTS campaign, even small variability within the cell populations for screening could easily invalidate an entire campaign. Neurodegenerative assays are particularly challenging because neurons are post-mitotic and cannot be expanded for implementation in HTS. Therefore, HTS for neuroprotective compounds requires a cell type that is robustly expandable and able to differentiate into all of the neuronal subtypes involved in disease pathogenesis. Here, we report the derivation and propagation using only small molecules of human neural progenitor cells (small molecule neural precursor cells; smNPCs). smNPCs are robust, exhibit immortal expansion, and do not require cumbersome manual culture and selection steps. We demonstrate that smNPCs have the potential to clonally and efficiently differentiate into neural tube lineages, including motor neurons (MNs) and midbrain dopaminergic neurons (mDANs) as well as neural crest lineages, including peripheral neurons and mesenchymal cells. These properties are so far only matched by pluripotent stem cells. Finally, to demonstrate the usefulness of smNPCs we show that mDANs differentiated from smNPCs with LRRK2 G2019S are more susceptible to apoptosis in the presence of oxidative stress compared to wild-type. Therefore, smNPCs are a powerful biological tool with properties that are optimal for large-scale disease modeling, phenotypic screening, and studies of early human development.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCells, CulturedElectrophysiologyEpithelial CellsHumansLeucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2Motor NeuronsNeural CrestNeural Stem CellsNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuronsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesLeucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2LRRK2 protein, humanProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID23533608
PMCPMC3606479
OpenAlexW2030775222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.