ArticleMolecular diversity2013
Design of peptide affinity ligands for S-protein: a comparison of combinatorial and de novo design strategies.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanofluidic device for continuous multiparameter quality assurance of biologics.Nature nanotechnology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design of peptide affinity ligands against biological targets is important for a broad range of applications. Here, we report on de novo and combinatorial strategies for the design of high-affinity and high-specificity peptides against S-protein as a target. The peptide libraries employed in this study contain (1) consensus motif (CM) sequences identified from high-throughput phage combinatorial screening, (2) point mutations of CM sequences, and (3) de novo sequences rationally designed based on stereo-chemical information of the complex between S-protein and its natural ligand, S-peptide. In general, point mutations to CM allowed for modulating peptide affinity and specificity over a broad range. This is particularly useful in designing peptides with varying affinities and specificities for the target. De novo sequences, especially those based on the S-protein binding pocket, on average bound with higher affinities within a narrow range (10-100 nM) as compared to point mutations to CM (1 nM-2 μM). As such, the approaches described here serve as a general guide for optimizing the design of peptide affinity ligands for a wide range of target proteins or applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23532725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.