Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23532629›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2014

Erythropoietin treatment in chemotherapy-induced anemia in previously untreated advanced esophagogastric cancer patients.

Thomas Thomaidis, Arndt Weinmann, Martin Sprinzl, Stephan Kanzler, Jochen Raedle, Matthias Ebert, Carl Cristoph Schimanski, Peter Robert Galle, Thomas Hoehler, Markus Moehler and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The tumor promoting roles of erythropoietin/erythropoietin receptor signaling pathway in gastric cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas Thomaidis1st Medical Department, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr.1, 55101, Mainz, Germany.
Arndt Weinmann
Martin Sprinzl
Stephan Kanzler
Jochen Raedle
Matthias Ebert
Carl Cristoph Schimanski
Peter Robert Galle
Thomas Hoehler
Markus Moehler
Upper-GI-Group of AIO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie), Germany
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEWestpfalz Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in chemotherapy-induced anemia has been a constant topic of debate over recent years. We prospectively assessed the efficacy of epoetin beta (Epo-b) in improving hemoglobin (Hb) levels and outcome in patients within an open label, randomized clinical phase II trial with advanced or metastatic gastric/esophagogastric cancer.

methodsPreviously untreated patients were randomized to receive 3-weekly cycles of capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) bid) for 14 days plus on day 1 either irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) or cisplatin 80 mg/m(2). Epo-b (30000 IU once weekly) was initiated in patients with Hb <11 g/dl and continued until Hb ≥12 g/dl was reached. If after 4 weeks the Hb increase was <0.5 g/dl, Epo-b was increased to 30000 IU, twice weekly.

resultsOf 118 patients enrolled, 32 received Epo-b treatment; of these, 65 % achieved an increase in Hb levels of at least 2 g/dl, with 74 % achieving the target Hb of ≥12 g/dl. Within the study population, patients receiving Epo-b showed better overall survival (median 14.5 vs. 8.0 months, P = 0.056) as well as a significantly improved disease control rate (78 vs. 55 %, P = 0.025). Patients in the irinotecan group profited significantly (P < 0.05) in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival under Epo-b treatment (median 6.5 vs 4.1 months and median 15.4 vs 8.4 months, respectively).

conclusionsEpo-b was effective in raising Hb levels in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. Patients receiving Epo-b had a significantly increased response to chemotherapy and a clear trend to improved survival.

Indexed as

Esophagogastric JunctionAdultAgedAnemiaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErythropoietinFemaleHemoglobinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecombinant ProteinsStomach Neoplasmsepoetin betaErythropoietinHemoglobinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23532629
OpenAlexW2034159865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.