Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23532056›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2013

Imaging the action of antimicrobial peptides on living bacterial cells.

Michelle L Gee, Matthew Burton, Alistair Grevis-James, Mohammed Akhter Hossain, Sally McArthur, Enzo A Palombo, John D Wade, Andrew H A Clayton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Antimicrobial Mechanism of pBD2 againstMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Qualitative and Quantitative Changes toLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle L GeeSchool of Chemistry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. mlgee@unimelb.edu.au
Matthew Burton
Alistair Grevis-James
Mohammed Akhter Hossain
Sally McArthur
Enzo A Palombo
John D Wade
Andrew H A Clayton
University of Melbourne · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AUFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides hold promise as broad-spectrum alternatives to conventional antibiotics. The mechanism of action of this class of peptide is a topical area of research focused predominantly on their interaction with artificial membranes. Here we compare the interaction mechanism of a model antimicrobial peptide with single artificial membranes and live bacterial cells. The interaction kinetics was imaged using time-lapse fluorescence lifetime imaging of a fluorescently-tagged melittin derivative. Interaction with the synthetic membranes resulted in membrane pore formation. In contrast, the interaction with bacteria led to transient membrane disruption and corresponding leakage of the cytoplasm, but surprisingly with a much reduced level of pore formation. The discovery that pore formation is a less significant part of lipid-peptide interaction in live bacteria highlights the mechanistic complexity of these interactions in living cells compared to simple artificial systems.

Indexed as

Membranes, Artificial1,2-DipalmitoylphosphatidylcholineAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCell MembraneEscherichia coliMelittenMembrane LipidsMicroscopy, FluorescenceUnilamellar Liposomes1,2-DipalmitoylphosphatidylcholineAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesMelittenMembrane LipidsMembranes, ArtificialUnilamellar Liposomes

Identifiers

PMID23532056
PMCPMC3609022
OpenAlexW2018489122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.