ArticleGenome biology and evolution2013
Differential genomic variation between short- and long-term bacterial evolution revealed by ultradeep sequencing.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A genetic link between epigenetic repressor AS1-AS2 and a putative small subunit processome in leaf polarity establishment of Arabidopsis.Biology open · 2016Article
- Article
- Deep sequencing of evolving pathogen populations: applications, errors, and bioinformatic solutions.Microbial informatics and experimentation · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutation and selection are both thought to impact significantly the nucleotide composition of bacterial genomes. Earlier studies have compared closely related strains to obtain mutation patterns based on the hypothesis that these bacterial strains had diverged so recently that selection will not have had enough time to play its role. In this study, we used a SOLiD autosequencer that was based on a dual-base encoding scheme to sequence the genome of Staphylococcus aureus with a mapping coverage of over 5,000×. By directly counting the variation obtained from these ultradeep sequencing reads, we found that A → G was the predominant single-base substitution and 1 bp deletions were the major small indel. These patterns are completely different from those obtained by comparison of closely related S. aureus strains, where C → T accounted for a larger proportion of mutations and deletions were shown to occur at an almost equal frequency to insertion. These findings suggest that the genomic differences between closely related bacterial strains have already undergone selection and are therefore not representative of spontaneous mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.