Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23531725›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2013

Differential genomic variation between short- and long-term bacterial evolution revealed by ultradeep sequencing.

Ye Feng, Hsiu-Ling Chen, Cheng-Hsun Chiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ye FengGenomics Research Center, Harbin Medical University, People's Republic of China. chchiu@adm.cgmh.org.tw
Hsiu-Ling Chen
Cheng-Hsun Chiu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation and selection are both thought to impact significantly the nucleotide composition of bacterial genomes. Earlier studies have compared closely related strains to obtain mutation patterns based on the hypothesis that these bacterial strains had diverged so recently that selection will not have had enough time to play its role. In this study, we used a SOLiD autosequencer that was based on a dual-base encoding scheme to sequence the genome of Staphylococcus aureus with a mapping coverage of over 5,000×. By directly counting the variation obtained from these ultradeep sequencing reads, we found that A → G was the predominant single-base substitution and 1 bp deletions were the major small indel. These patterns are completely different from those obtained by comparison of closely related S. aureus strains, where C → T accounted for a larger proportion of mutations and deletions were shown to occur at an almost equal frequency to insertion. These findings suggest that the genomic differences between closely related bacterial strains have already undergone selection and are therefore not representative of spontaneous mutation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationGenome, BacterialBacteriaBase SequenceHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence DataMutationStaphylococcus aureusTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23531725
PMCPMC3622303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.