ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences2012
A study of recipient related predictors of success in oocyte donation program.
Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Live birth rate after oocyte donation in females diagnosed with turner syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- Embryo transfer strategy and therapeutic options in infertile patients with thin endometrium: a systematic review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Pooled it
- Aging Regulates Receptivity by Modulating the Expression of Osteopontin and HOXA10 in the Human Endometrium.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Endometrial aging and uterine receptivity: endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) outcomes in female patients of diverse age groups.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Maternal age at transfer following autologous oocyte cryopreservation is not associated with live birth rates.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of endometrial aging: lessons from natural conceptions and assisted reproductive technology cycles.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Dehydroepiandrosterone enhances decidualization in women of advanced reproductive age.Fertility and sterility · 2018Article
- Endocrine and local control of the primate corpus luteum.Reproductive biology · 2013Review
- Evaluating the Contribution of Oocyte, Sperm, and Uterus in Determining the Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection - A Retrospective Observational Comparative Study on Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection using Own Oocytes and Donor Oocytes.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
- Effect of Endometrial Thickness and duration of Estrogen Supplementation onJournal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
- Development of A Questionnaire to Measure Attitude toward Oocyte Donation.International journal of fertility & sterilityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOocyte donation is an invaluable therapy for couples with impending or complete ovarian failure. In addition, oocyte donation affords a scientific opportunity to study the unique biologic participation of the uterus in the process of human embryo implantation.
aimTo identify the recipient variables that may have a significant impact on pregnancy outcome in order to optimize results of an oocyte donation program. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: A prospective study conducted from March 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011 at a private tertiary care IVF Clinic. Materials and methods A total of 270 recipients resulting in embryo transfer as a result of oocyte donation were enrolled. Clinical and Ongoing pregnancy rates, Implantation rates were calculated according to different age groups, Endometrial thickness, Indication, Day and number of embryos transferred. Data was evaluated as chi square analyses with comparative significance determined at P <.05.
resultsIn recipients less than 40 years of age, higher ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates (41.9% and 24.6%) were seen as compared to recipients above 40 years (21.8% and 13.18%) respectively. Pregnancy and implantation rates increased with increasing endometrial thickness but the difference was not statistically significant. A higher ongoing pregnancy rate (40.9% vs.28.8%) and implantation rate (23% vs.19.6%) was demonstrated with Day 3 embryo transfer compared to Day 2 transfer.
conclusionA declining endometrial receptivity may result in lower implantation and pregnancy rates in recipients above the age of 40 years, more pronounced after the age of 45 years. An endometrial thickness of >8 mm is considered ideal before transfer. Transfer of two selected embryos on day 3 yields a favorable pregnancy outcome with reduced multiple pregnancy rates. Recipient's age above 45 years has negative impact on pregnancy outcome whereas embryo transfers on Day 3 yields better pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.