Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23531482›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2013

The hCMEC/D3 cell line as a model of the human blood brain barrier.

Babette Weksler, Ignacio A Romero, Pierre-Olivier Couraud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 376 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
376citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

376 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CRISPR interference in aJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  16. Shiga Toxin Induces ApoptosisJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  17. Unveiling the Impact ofJournal of the American Heart Association · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in physiology · 2026
    Article

316 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Babette WekslerInserm, U1016, Institut Cochin, Paris, France. pierre-olivier.couraud@inserm.fr.
Ignacio A Romero
Pierre-Olivier Couraud

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first attempts in the 1970s to isolate cerebral microvessel endothelial cells (CECs) in order to model the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in vitro, the need for a human BBB model that closely mimics the in vivo phenotype and is reproducible and easy to grow, has been widely recognized by cerebrovascular researchers in both academia and industry. While primary human CECs would ideally be the model of choice, the paucity of available fresh human cerebral tissue makes wide-scale studies impractical. The brain microvascular endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3 represents one such model of the human BBB that can be easily grown and is amenable to cellular and molecular studies on pathological and drug transport mechanisms with relevance to the central nervous system (CNS). Indeed, since the development of this cell line in 2005 over 100 studies on different aspects of cerebral endothelial biology and pharmacology have been published. Here we review the suitability of this cell line as a human BBB model for pathogenic and drug transport studies and we critically consider its advantages and limitations.

Identifiers

PMID23531482
PMCPMC3623852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.