Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23531357›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2013

Continuing difficulties in interpreting CNV data: lessons from a genome-wide CNV association study of Australian HNPCC/lynch syndrome patients.

Bente A Talseth-Palmer, Elizabeth G Holliday, Tiffany-Jane Evans, Mark McEvoy, John Attia, Desma M Grice, Amy L Masson, Cliff Meldrum, Allan Spigelman, Rodney J Scott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ROBO1 deletion as a novel germline alteration in breast and colorectal cancer patients.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bente A Talseth-PalmerSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. Bente.Talseth-Palmer@newcastle.edu.au
Elizabeth G Holliday
Tiffany-Jane Evans
Mark McEvoy
John Attia
Desma M Grice
Amy L Masson
Cliff Meldrum
Allan Spigelman
Rodney J Scott
John Hunter Hospital · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUHunter New England Local Health District · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)/Lynch syndrome (LS) is a cancer syndrome characterised by early-onset epithelial cancers, especially colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. The aim of the current study was to use SNP-array technology to identify genomic aberrations which could contribute to the increased risk of cancer in HNPCC/LS patients.

methodsIndividuals diagnosed with HNPCC/LS (100) and healthy controls (384) were genotyped using the Illumina Human610-Quad SNP-arrays. Copy number variation (CNV) calling and association analyses were performed using Nexus software, with significant results validated using QuantiSNP. TaqMan Copy-Number assays were used for verification of CNVs showing significant association with HNPCC/LS identified by both software programs.

resultsWe detected copy number (CN) gains associated with HNPCC/LS status on chromosome 7q11.21 (28% cases and 0% controls, Nexus; p =3.60E-20 and QuantiSNP; p < 1.00E-16) and 16p11.2 (46% in cases, while a CN loss was observed in 23% of controls, Nexus; p = 4.93E-21 and QuantiSNP; p = 5.00E-06) via in silico analyses. TaqMan Copy-Number assay was used for validation of CNVs showing significant association with HNPCC/LS. In addition, CNV burden (total CNV length, average CNV length and number of observed CNV events) was significantly greater in cases compared to controls.

conclusionA greater CNV burden was identified in HNPCC/LS cases compared to controls supporting the notion of higher genomic instability in these patients. One intergenic locus on chromosome 7q11.21 is possibly associated with HNPCC/LS and deserves further investigation. The results from this study highlight the complexities of fluorescent based CNV analyses. The inefficiency of both CNV detection methods to reproducibly detect observed CNVs demonstrates the need for sequence data to be considered alongside intensity data to avoid false positive results.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, HumanAllelesAustraliaChromosomes, Human, Pair 7Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA RepairGene FrequencyGenetic LociGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomic InstabilityGenotypeHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID23531357
PMCPMC3626775
OpenAlexW2028915799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.