Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2013
Sepsis biomarkers in unselected patients on admission to intensive or high-dependency care.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of pancreatic stone protein in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Accuracy of pancreatic stone protein for the diagnosis of infection in hospitalized adults: a systematic review and individual patient level meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Plasma interleukin-6 concentration for the diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Pancreatic stone protein versus conventional biomarkers for prognostic discrimination in sepsis: a meta-analysis of paired AUC comparisons.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Comparison of serial pancreatic stone protein, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for the diagnosis of infection and sepsis in critically Ill patients: a multicentre prospective study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Clinical Value of Galectin-9, Soluble TREM-1, and Soluble CD25 Among Critically Ill Patients with Organ Failure in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Long non-coding RNA EPB41L4A-AS1 as a biomarker of sepsis alleviates inflammatory response by targeting miR-146a-5p.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Value of Early Kinetics of Procalcitonin with Point-of-Care Test to Predict Postoperative Abscess Following Non-Complicated Acute Appendicitis: A Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Regenerating island-derived protein 3E concentrations in healthy dogs and dogs with various inflammatory processes.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Possible Pathophysiological Role of Pancreatic Stone Protein in Sepsis and Its Potential Therapeutic Implication.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Ability of Pancreatic Stone Protein: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Examining pancreatic stone protein response in ICU-acquired bloodstream infections: a matched event analysis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Article
- The effect of heparins on plasma concentration of heparin-binding protein: a pilot study.BJA open · 2024Article
- HNL Dimer in plasma is a unique and useful biomarker for the monitoring of antibiotic treatment in sepsis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Heparin Binding Protein in Early Differential Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2024Article
- The Role of the Pancreatic Stone Protein in Predicting Intra-Abdominal Infection-Related Complications: A Prospective Observational Single-Center Cohort Study.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Point-of-care pancreatic stone protein measurement in critically ill COVID-19 patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Article
- The Role of Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) as a Biomarker of Pregnancy-Related Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough many sepsis biomarkers have shown promise in selected patient groups, only C-reactive protein and procalcitonin (PCT) have entered clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate three promising novel sepsis biomarkers in unselected patients at admission to intensive care. We assessed the performance of pancreatic stone protein (PSP), soluble CD25 (sCD25) and heparin binding protein (HBP) in distinguishing patients with sepsis from those with a non-infective systemic inflammatory response and the ability of these markers to indicate severity of illness.
methodsPlasma levels of the biomarkers, PCT and selected inflammatory cytokines were measured in samples taken from 219 patients during the first six hours of admission to intensive or high dependency care. Patients with a systemic inflammatory response were categorized as having sepsis or a non-infective aetiology, with or without markers of severity, using standard diagnostic criteria.
resultsBoth PSP and sCD25 performed well as biomarkers of sepsis irrespective of severity of illness. For both markers the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was greater than 0.9; PSP 0.927 (0.887 to 0.968) and sCD25 0.902 (0.854 to 0.949). Procalcitonin and IL6 also performed well as markers of sepsis whilst in this intensive care unit (ICU) population, HBP did not: PCT 0.840 (0.778 to 0.901), IL6 0.805 (0.739 to 0.870) and HBP 0.607 (0.519 to 0.694). Levels of both PSP and PCT reflected severity of illness and both markers performed well in differentiating patients with severe sepsis from severely ill patients with a non-infective systemic inflammatory response: AUCs 0.955 (0.909 to 1) and 0.837 (0.732 to 0.941) respectively. Although levels of sCD25 did not correlate with severity, the addition of sCD25 to either PCT or PSP in a multivariate model improved the diagnostic accuracy of either marker alone.
conclusionsPSP and sCD25 perform well as sepsis biomarkers in patients with suspected sepsis at the time of admission to intensive or high dependency care. These markers warrant further assessment of their prognostic value. Whereas previously published data indicate HBP has clinical utility in the emergency department, it did not perform well in an intensive-care population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.