Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23531280›Full record

Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2013

Impact of treatment planning target volumen (PTV) size on radiation induced diarrhoea following selenium supplementation in gynecologic radiation oncology--a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, phase III trial.

Ralph Muecke, Oliver Micke, Lutz Schomburg, Jens Buentzel, Michael Glatzel, Dieter Baaske, Regina Berndt-Skorka, Franz J Prott, Berthold Reichl, Klaus Kisters and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Complementary Medicine in the Treatment of Cancer Patients.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Therapeutic Potential of Selenium and Selenium Compounds in Cervical Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Ralph MueckeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Lippe Hospital, Lemgo, Germany. muecke@klinikum-lippe.de
Oliver Micke
Lutz Schomburg
Jens Buentzel
Michael Glatzel
Dieter Baaske
Regina Berndt-Skorka
Franz J Prott
Berthold Reichl
Klaus Kisters
Ulrich Schaefer
Jutta Huebner
Hans Th Eich
Guenther Kundt
Irenaeus A Adamietz
Klinikum Lippe · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinikum Chemnitz · DEKlinikum Weiden · DENeubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences · DESt. Anna Hospital · DESt. Franziskus Hospital · DESt. Josefs Hospital · DESüdharz Klinikum · DEUniversitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DEUniversity of Münster · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a previous analysis (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:828-835,2010), we assessed whether an adjuvant supplementation with selenium (Se) improves Se status and reduces the radiation-induced side-effects of patients treated by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for cervical and uterine cancer. Now, a potential relation between the planning target volume (PTV) of the RT and the Se effect concerning radiation induced diarrhoea was evaluated in detail.

methodsWhole blood Se concentrations had been measured in patients with cervical (n=11) and uterine cancer (n=70) after surgical treatment, during, and at the end of RT. Patients with initial Se concentrations of less than 84 μg/l were categorized as Se-deficient and randomized before RT to receive Se (as sodium selenite) per os on the days of RT, or to receive no supplement during RT. Diarrhoea was graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria system (CTC, Version 2a). The evaluation of the PTV of the RT was ascertained with the help of a specialised computer-assisted treatment planning software used for radiation planning procedure.

resultsA total of 81 patients had been randomized for the initial supplementation study, 39 of which received Se [selenium group, SeG] and 42 serving as controls [control group, CG]. Mean Se levels did not differ between SeG and CG upon study initiation, but were significantly higher in the SeG compared to the CG at the end of RT. The actuarial incidence of at least CTC 2 radiation induced diarrhoea in the SeG was 20.5% compared to 44.5% in the CG (p=0.04). The median PTV in both groups was 1302 ml (916-4608). With a PTV of <= 1302 ml (n=41) the actuarial incidence of at least CTC 2 diarrhoea in the SeG was 22.3% (4 of 18 patients) compared to 34.8% (8 of 23 patients) in the CG (p=0.50). In patients with a PTV of > 1302 ml (n=40) the actuarial incidence of at least CTC 2 diarrhoea in the SeG was 19.1% (4 of 21 patients) versus 52.6% (10 of 19 patients) in the CG (p=0.046).

conclusionsSe supplementation during RT was effective to improve blood Se status in Se-deficient cervical and uterine cancer patients, and reduces episodes and severity of RT-induced diarrhoea. This effect was most pronounced and significant in patients with large PTV (> 1302 ml).

Indexed as

Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaDiarrheaDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiotherapy, AdjuvantSeleniumSodium SeleniteUterine Cervical NeoplasmsSeleniumSodium Selenite

Identifiers

PMID23531280
PMCPMC3621795
OpenAlexW2116893797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.