Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23530833›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

Patterns and evolution of ACGT repeat cis-element landscape across four plant genomes.

Rajesh Mehrotra, Sachin Sethi, Ipshita Zutshi, Purva Bhalothia, Sandhya Mehrotra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Genome-Wide Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Identifying aPeerJ · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Primer Designing for Amplifying an AT-Rich Promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Current genomics · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Plant physiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Osmolality/salinity-responsive enhancers (OSREs) control induction of osmoprotective genes in euryhaline fish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajesh MehrotraBiological Sciences Department, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, RJ, India. rmehrotra@pilanibits-pilani.ac.in
Sachin Sethi
Ipshita Zutshi
Purva Bhalothia
Sandhya Mehrotra
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscription factor binding is regulated by several interactions, primarily involving cis-element binding. These binding sites maintain specificity by means of their sequence, and other additional factors such as inter-motif distance and spacer specificity. The ACGT core sequence has been established as a functionally important cis-element which frequently regulates gene expression in synergy with other cis-elements. In this study, we used two monocotyledonous - Oryza sativa and Sorghum bicolor, and two dicotyledonous species - Arabidopsis thaliana and Glycine max to analyze the conservation of co-occurring ACGT core elements in plant promoters with respect to spacer distance between them. Using data generated from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, we also identified conserved regions across all spacers and possible conditions regulating gene promoters with multiple ACGT cis-elements.

resultsOur data indicated specific predominant spacer lengths between co-occurring ACGT elements, but these lengths were not universally conserved across all species under analysis. However, the frequency distribution indicated local regions of high correlation among monocots and dicots. Sequence specificity data clearly revealed a preference for G at the first and C at the terminal position of a spacer sequence, suggesting that the G-box motif is the most prevalent for the ACGT class of promoters. Using gene expression databases, we also observed trends suggesting that co-occurring ACGT elements are responsible for gene regulation in response to exogenous stress. Conservation in patterns of ACGT (N) ACGT among orthologous genes also indicated the possibility that emergence of functional significance across species was a result of parallel evolution of these cis-elements.

conclusionsAlthough the importance of ACGT elements has been acknowledged for several plant species, ours is the first study that attempts to compare their occurrence across four species and analyze conservation among them. The apparent preference for particular spacer distances suggest that these motifs might be implicated in important physiological functions which are yet to be identified. Variations in correlation patterns among monocots and dicots might arise out of differences in transcriptional regulation in the two classes. In accordance with literature, we established the involvement of co-occurring ACGT elements in stress responses and showed how this regulation differs with variation in the ACGT (N) ACGT motif. We believe that our study will be an essential resource in determining optimum spacer length and spacer sequence between ACGT elements for promoter design in future.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantArabidopsisBase SequenceDatabases, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, PlantGlycine maxMicrosatellite RepeatsOryzaPlant ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalSorghumPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23530833
PMCPMC3622567
OpenAlexW2061784681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.