Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23530100›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2013

Biologic determinants of tumor recurrence in stage II colon cancer: validation study of the 12-gene recurrence score in cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 9581.

Alan P Venook, Donna Niedzwiecki, Margarita Lopatin, Xing Ye, Mark Lee, Paula N Friedman, Wendy Frankel, Kim Clark-Langone, Carl Millward, Steven Shak and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Updated guidelines for biomarker testing in colorectal carcinoma: a national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2015
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Prospective Multicenter Study on the Prognostic and Predictive Impact of Tumor Budding in Stage II Colon Cancer: Results From the SACURA Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Machine Learning Predicts Oxaliplatin Benefit in Early Colon Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Ready for ctDNA-guided treatment decisions in colorectal cancer?Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2023
    Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan P VenookUniversity of California San Francisco Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA. venook@cc.ucsf.edu
Donna Niedzwiecki
Margarita Lopatin
Xing Ye
Mark Lee
Paula N Friedman
Wendy Frankel
Kim Clark-Langone
Carl Millward
Steven Shak
Richard M Goldberg
Najjia N Mahmoud
Robert S Warren
Richard L Schilsky
Monica M Bertagnolli
Rush University · US

Funding

CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B MINORITY SATELLITE SUPPLEMENU10CA031946 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1985 to 2013
$158.4M
CANCER &LEUKEMIA GROUP B STATISTICAL CENTERU10CA033601 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SARGENT, DANIEL J. · 1985 to 2013
$69.4M
UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
RESEARCH BASE SUPPORT FOR COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PRU10CA037447 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M, PASKETT, ELECTRA D. · 1985 to 2015
$25.3M
Cancer and Leukemia Group B Human Specimen RepositoriesU24CA114725 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 2005 to 2014
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA31946NCI NIH HHS CA33601NCI NIH HHS U10 CA031946NCI NIH HHS U10 CA033601NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037447NCI NIH HHS U24 CA114725NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA greater understanding of the biology of tumor recurrence should improve adjuvant treatment decision making. We conducted a validation study of the 12-gene recurrence score (RS), a quantitative assay integrating stromal response and cell cycle gene expression, in tumor specimens from patients enrolled onto Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9581. PATIENTS AND

methodsCALGB 9581 randomly assigned 1,713 patients with stage II colon cancer to treatment with edrecolomab or observation and found no survival difference. The analysis reported here included all patients with available tissue and recurrence (n = 162) and a random (approximately 1:3) selection of nonrecurring patients. RS was assessed in 690 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples with quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction by using prespecified genes and a previously validated algorithm. Association of RS and recurrence was analyzed by weighted Cox proportional hazards regression.

resultsContinuous RS was significantly associated with risk of recurrence (P = .013) as was mismatch repair (MMR) gene deficiency (P = .044). In multivariate analyses, RS was the strongest predictor of recurrence (P = .004), independent of T stage, MMR, number of nodes examined, grade, and lymphovascular invasion. In T3 MMR-intact (MMR-I) patients, prespecified low and high RS groups had average 5-year recurrence risks of 13% (95% CI, 10% to 16%) and 21% (95% CI, 16% to 26%), respectively.

conclusionThe 12-gene RS predicts recurrence in stage II colon cancer in CALGB 9581. This is consistent with the importance of stromal response and cell cycle gene expression in colon tumor recurrence. RS appears to be most discerning for patients with T3 MMR-I tumors, although markers such as grade and lymphovascular invasion did not add value in this subset of patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsColonic NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansLeukemiaLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsEdrecolomab

Identifiers

PMID23530100
PMCPMC3641698
OpenAlexW2148206047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.