Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23529949›Full record

ReviewClinical cardiology2013

Electrical plasticity and cardioprotection in myocardial ischemia--role of selective sodium channel blockers.

Rosalinda Madonna, Cihan Cevik, Maher Nasser

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosalinda MadonnaTexas Heart Institute and St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Department of adult cardiiology, Houston, Texas, USA. rmadonna@unich.it
Cihan Cevik
Maher Nasser
Baylor College of Medicine · USSt. Luke's Episcopal Hospital · USSt. Luke's Episcopal Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of electrical protection of the ischemic myocardium is in constant evolution and has recently been supported by experimental and clinical studies. Historically, antiplatelet agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, and statins have been all proposed as drugs conferring anti-ischemic cardioprotection. This was supported by the evidence consistently indicating that all these drugs were capable of reducing mortality and the risk of repeat myocardial infarction. The electrical plasticity paradigm is, however, a novel concept that depicts the benefits of improved sodium channel blockade with drugs such as ranolazine and cariporide. Although it has been hypothesized that the protective role of ranolazine depends on decreased fatty acid β-oxidation affecting preconditioning, we speculate against such a hypothesis, because inhibition of β-oxidation requires higher concentrations of the drug, above the therapeutic range. Rather, we discuss the key role of calcium overload reduction through inhibition of the late sodium current (I(Na)). Mechanisms driving cardioprotection involve the block of a cascade of complex ionic exchanges that can result in intracellular acidosis, excess cytosolic calcium, myocardial cellular dysfunction, and eventually cell injury and death. In this review we discuss the studies that demonstrate how electrical plasticity through sodium channel blockers can promote cardioprotection against ischemia in coronary heart disease.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCardiotonic AgentsEnergy MetabolismHeart Conduction SystemHumansMyocardial ContractionMyocardial IschemiaSodium Channel BlockersCardiotonic AgentsSodium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID23529949
PMCPMC6649406
OpenAlexW1485206025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.