Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23529719›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2013

Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Kai Chen, Guodong Li, Dong Fu, Chaoqun Yuan, Qiang Zhang, Zhengdong Cai

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Does patellar denervation reduce post-operative anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Do we need to restore patellar thickness after total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital / Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China. magaer@126.com
Guodong Li
Dong Fu
Chaoqun Yuan
Qiang Zhang
Zhengdong Cai
Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatella resurfacing or nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of patellar resurfacing through an evaluation of the current literature.

methodsWe carried out a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing total knee arthroplasties performed with and without patellar resurfacing. Outcomes of reoperation, anterior knee pain and knee scores were analysed.

resultsFourteen trials assessing 1,725 knees were eligible. The absolute risk of reoperation was reduced by 4 % (95 % confidence interval, 2-6 %) in the patellar resurfacing arm (between-study heterogeneity, P = 0.05, I(2) = 42 %), implying that one would have to resurface 25 patellae (95 % confidence interval, 17-50 patellae) in order to prevent one reoperation. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of anterior knee pain, knee pain score, Knee Society score and knee function score. But in the studies followed up for a mean time of not less than five years, a difference was found between the two arms in Knee Society scores (RR = 2.14, 95 % confidence interval, 0.76-3.52; P = 0.002).

conclusionsThe available evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing reduces the risk of reoperation after total knee arthroplasty. Patellar resurfacing patients may make a difference in long-term follow-up (five or more 5 years) of Knee Society scores. In other aspects, the benefit of patellar resurfacing is limited. Additionally, more carefully and scientifically designed randomised controlled trials are required to further prove the claim.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisArthralgiaArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneePatellaReoperationRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23529719
PMCPMC3664152
OpenAlexW1972136704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.