ArticleExperimental brain research2013
Feedback reliance during an arm-tapping task with obstacle avoidance in adults with Down syndrome.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Foot Morphology on the Center of Pressure Pattern in Patients with Down Syndrome.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The effect of training on variability and accuracy of overhand throwing in children with Down syndrome.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2021Article
- The multiple process model of goal-directed aiming/reaching: insights on limb control from various special populations.Experimental brain research · 2020Review
- Pre-programming in overhand throwing of children with Down syndrome: role of the generalized motor program.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2019Article
- A biomechanical study of gait initiation in Down syndrome.BMC neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal movement control reflects a combination of both feedback and feedforward processes. However, as motor control evolves, feedforward mechanisms become prevailing respect to feedback-based movements, and less reliance on sensory information leads to a decreased number of corrections in the trajectory. In subjects with Down syndrome (DS), the study of the wrist's trajectory during an arm-tapping task revealed feedback-based corrections designed to reduce the degree of discrepancy between the position of the limb and the target, leading to the assumption that performers with DS have problems with movement planning and feedforward control. The present study was aimed at expanding the evidence about motor control in DS by evaluating the influence of a perturbing factor (an obstacle) on motor control strategies during an arm-tapping task and to clarify if the presence of an obstacle elicited a higher reliance on feedback control in controls and in DS. Sixteen right-handed adults with DS and 21 right-handed, age-matched control subjects (N) were evaluated by means of quantitative motion analysis. The results suggest that the presence of an obstacle elicited changes in the motor strategies of both DS and N, with a destabilizing effect that led subjects to rely more on feedback control. DS showed some aspects of movement efficiency that were in accordance with N strategies, but the prevailing factor of optimization in these subjects remained safety. A focused rehabilitation could help DS subjects to develop more efficient motor strategies in the presence of motor uncertainty and perturbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23529511What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.