Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23529511›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2013

Feedback reliance during an arm-tapping task with obstacle avoidance in adults with Down syndrome.

Sara Laura Vimercati, Manuela Galli, Chiara Rigoldi, Andrea Ancillao, Giorgio Albertini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Influence of Foot Morphology on the Center of Pressure Pattern in Patients with Down Syndrome.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara Laura VimercatiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, P.zza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy. vimercati.sara@gmail.com
Manuela Galli
Chiara Rigoldi
Andrea Ancillao
Giorgio Albertini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal movement control reflects a combination of both feedback and feedforward processes. However, as motor control evolves, feedforward mechanisms become prevailing respect to feedback-based movements, and less reliance on sensory information leads to a decreased number of corrections in the trajectory. In subjects with Down syndrome (DS), the study of the wrist's trajectory during an arm-tapping task revealed feedback-based corrections designed to reduce the degree of discrepancy between the position of the limb and the target, leading to the assumption that performers with DS have problems with movement planning and feedforward control. The present study was aimed at expanding the evidence about motor control in DS by evaluating the influence of a perturbing factor (an obstacle) on motor control strategies during an arm-tapping task and to clarify if the presence of an obstacle elicited a higher reliance on feedback control in controls and in DS. Sixteen right-handed adults with DS and 21 right-handed, age-matched control subjects (N) were evaluated by means of quantitative motion analysis. The results suggest that the presence of an obstacle elicited changes in the motor strategies of both DS and N, with a destabilizing effect that led subjects to rely more on feedback control. DS showed some aspects of movement efficiency that were in accordance with N strategies, but the prevailing factor of optimization in these subjects remained safety. A focused rehabilitation could help DS subjects to develop more efficient motor strategies in the presence of motor uncertainty and perturbations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceArmDown SyndromeFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.