Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23529356›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2013

An effective method based on wet-heat treatment for the selective isolation of Micromonospora from estuarine sediments.

Takeshi Terahara, Takeshi Kobayashi, Chiaki Imada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unveiling the bioactive potential of Actinomycetota from the Tagus River estuary.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takeshi TeraharaGraduate School of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, 4-5-7 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8477, Japan. terahara@kaiyodai.ac.jp
Takeshi Kobayashi
Chiaki Imada

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several methods for the isolation of Micromonospora from soil samples have been developed; however, it is unclear whether these methods are optimal for estuarine samples. In this study, we optimized the conditions of a wet-heat method for the selective isolation of Micromonospora from estuarine sediments. Sediments were collected from the Arakawa River (estuarine sediments) and Tokyo Bay (marine sediments). Sediment samples were wet-heated at 45, 55, or 65 °C for 30 min and then incubated at 27 °C for 3 weeks. After incubation, most of the actinomycete colonies were macroscopically determined to be of the genus Micromonospora or Streptomyces. In contrast to the treatment at 55 °C, treatment at 65 °C drastically reduced the number of Streptomyces colonies but increased the number of Micromonospora colonies from the estuarine sediments. This procedure allowed us to grow cultures that were composed of more than 90 % Micromonospora. In addition, treatment at 65 °C did not affect the diversity of Micromonospora species compared with treatment at 55 °C. These results indicate that the wet-heat method, which involves pre-treating the sediment at 65 °C for 30 min, is a very simple and effective method for the selective enrichment of a large number of diverse Micromonospora from estuarine sediments. Our results may lead to the isolation of new Micromonospora species, which produce novel bioactive compounds, from different estuarine sediments.

Indexed as

EstuariesDNA, BacterialGeologic SedimentsHot TemperatureMicromonosporaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNAStreptomycesDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.