ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2013
An effective method based on wet-heat treatment for the selective isolation of Micromonospora from estuarine sediments.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the bioactive potential of Actinomycetota from the Tagus River estuary.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024Article
- Actinobacteria from Arctic and Atlantic deep-sea sediments-Biodiversity and bioactive potential.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Isolation of Actinomycetes with Cellulolytic and Antimicrobial Activities from Soils Collected from an Urban Green Space in the Philippines.International journal of microbiology · 2021Article
- A Simple Culture Method Enhances the Recovery of Culturable Actinobacteria From Coastal Sediments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Marine Rare Actinomycetes: A Promising Source of Structurally Diverse and Unique Novel Natural Products.Marine drugs · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several methods for the isolation of Micromonospora from soil samples have been developed; however, it is unclear whether these methods are optimal for estuarine samples. In this study, we optimized the conditions of a wet-heat method for the selective isolation of Micromonospora from estuarine sediments. Sediments were collected from the Arakawa River (estuarine sediments) and Tokyo Bay (marine sediments). Sediment samples were wet-heated at 45, 55, or 65 °C for 30 min and then incubated at 27 °C for 3 weeks. After incubation, most of the actinomycete colonies were macroscopically determined to be of the genus Micromonospora or Streptomyces. In contrast to the treatment at 55 °C, treatment at 65 °C drastically reduced the number of Streptomyces colonies but increased the number of Micromonospora colonies from the estuarine sediments. This procedure allowed us to grow cultures that were composed of more than 90 % Micromonospora. In addition, treatment at 65 °C did not affect the diversity of Micromonospora species compared with treatment at 55 °C. These results indicate that the wet-heat method, which involves pre-treating the sediment at 65 °C for 30 min, is a very simple and effective method for the selective enrichment of a large number of diverse Micromonospora from estuarine sediments. Our results may lead to the isolation of new Micromonospora species, which produce novel bioactive compounds, from different estuarine sediments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23529356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.