Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23529210›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2013

Temporary authorization for use: does the French patient access programme for unlicensed medicines impact market access after formal licensing?

Albane Degrassat-Théas, Pascal Paubel, Olivier Parent de Curzon, Claude Le Pen, Martine Sinègre

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Compassionate use of orphan drugs.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2015
    Article
  9. Market access pathways for cell therapies in France.Journal of market access & health policy · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Albane Degrassat-ThéasLaboratory of Economics and Management of Health Organizations (LEGOS), Paris-Dauphine University, Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 75016, Paris, France. albane.degrassat-theas@eps.aphp.fr
Pascal Paubel
Olivier Parent de Curzon
Claude Le Pen
Martine Sinègre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo reach the French market, a new drug requires a marketing authorization (MA) and price and reimbursement agreements. These hurdles could delay access to new and promising drugs. Since 1992, French law authorizes the use of unlicensed drugs on an exceptional and temporary basis through a compassionate-use programme, known as Temporary Authorization for Use (ATU). This programme was implemented to improve early access to drugs under development or authorized abroad. However, it is suspected to be inflationary, bypassing public bodies in charge of health technology assessment (HTA) and of pricing.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to observe the market access after the formal licensing of drugs that went through this compassionate-use programme.

methodsWe included all ATUs that received an MA between 1 January 2005 and 30 June 2010. We first examined market access delays from these drugs using the standard administrative path. We positioned this result in relation to launch delays observed in France (for all outpatient drugs) and in other major European markets. Second, we assessed the bargaining power of a hospital purchaser after those drugs had obtained an MA by calculating the price growth rate after the approval.

resultsDuring the study period, 77 ATUs were formally licensed. The study concluded that, from the patient's perspective, licensing and public bodies' review time was shortened by a combined total of 36 months. The projected 11-month review time of public bodies may be longer than delays usually observed for outpatient drugs. Nonetheless, the study revealed significant benefits for French patient access based on comparable processing to launch time with those of other European countries with tight price control policies. In return, a 12 % premium, on average, is paid to pharmaceutical companies while drugs are under this status (sub-analysis on 56 drugs).

conclusionsIn many instances, the ATU programme responds to a public health need by accelerating the availability of new drugs even though this study suggests an impact of the programme on the market access of these drugs for which the standard administrative path is longer than usual. In addition, pharmaceutical companies seem to market compassionate-use drugs with a presumed benefit/risk ratio at a price that guarantees a margin for future negotiation.

Indexed as

Compassionate Use TrialsCosts and Cost AnalysisDrug ApprovalDrug IndustryFranceHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsReimbursement MechanismsTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalTime FactorsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.