Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23529133›Full record

ArticlemAbs

Agonistic TAM-163 antibody targeting tyrosine kinase receptor-B: applying mechanistic modeling to enable preclinical to clinical translation and guide clinical trial design.

Yulia Vugmeyster, Cynthia Rohde, Mylene Perreault, Ruth E Gimeno, Pratap Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Tutorial on Target-Mediated Drug Disposition (TMDD) Models.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yulia VugmeysterPharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism; Pfizer, Inc.; Cambridge, MA USA.
Cynthia RohdeDrug Safety R&D; Pfizer, Inc.; Cambridge, MA USA.
Mylene PerreaultCardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Research Unit; Pfizer, Inc.; Cambridge, MA USA.
Ruth E GimenoChief Scientific Officer; Eli Lilly & Co; Indianapolis, IN USA.
Pratap SinghPharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism; Pfizer, Inc.; Cambridge, MA USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USDrug Safety Research Unit · GBEli Lilly (United States) · USInstitut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TAM-163, an agonist monoclonal antibody targeting tyrosine receptor kinase-B (TrkB), is currently being investigated as a potential body weight modulatory agent in humans. To support the selection of the dose range for the first-in-human (FIH) trial of TAM-163, we conducted a mechanistic analysis of the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data (e.g., body weight gain) obtained in lean cynomolgus and obese rhesus monkeys following single doses ranging from 0.3 to 60 mg/kg. A target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) model was used to describe the observed nonlinear PK and Emax approach was used to describe the observed dose-dependent PD effect. The TMDD model development was supported by the experimental determination of the binding affinity constant (9.4 nM) and internalization rate of the drug-target complex (2.08 h(-1)). These mechanistic analyses enabled linking of exposure, target (TrkB) coverage, and pharmacological activity (e.g., PD) in monkeys, and indicated that ≥ 38% target coverage (time-average) was required to achieve significant body weight gain in monkeys. Based on the scaling of the TMDD model from monkeys to humans and assuming similar relationship between the target coverage and pharmacological activity between monkey and humans, subcutaneous (SC) doses of 1 and 15 mg/kg in humans were projected to be the minimally and the fully pharmacologically active doses, respectively. Based on the minimal anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) approach for starting dose selection, the dose of 0.05 mg/kg (3 mg for a 60 kg human) SC was recommended as the starting dose for FIH trials, because at this dose level<10% target coverage was projected at Cmax (and all other time points). This study illustrates a rational mechanistic approach for the selection of FIH dose range for a therapeutic protein with a complex model of action.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Obesity AgentsBody WeightCachexiaCHO CellsClinical Trials as TopicCricetulusDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Dosage CalculationsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMacaca fascicularisAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Obesity AgentsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinasesantibodybody weightCachexiamodelingpharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsPK/PD modelingTAM-163TMDDTrkB

Identifiers

PMID23529133
PMCPMC4169031
OpenAlexW1988118336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.