Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23529035›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2013

Comparing the suitability of autodock, gold and glide for the docking and predicting the possible targets of Ru(II)-based complexes as anticancer agents.

Adebayo A Adeniyi, Peter A Ajibade

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Triazolyl Ru(II), Os(II), and Ir(III) complexes as potential HIV-1 inhibitors.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hypouricemic Effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  15. Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adebayo A AdeniyiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa.
Peter A Ajibade

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cancer chemotherapy, metal-based complexes have been recognized as the most promising means of inhibiting cancer growth due to the successful application of cis-platin and its derivatives above many of the existing organic anticancer agents. The limitations in their rational design can be traced to the complexity of the mechanism of their operations, lack of proper knowledge of their targets and lack of force fields in docking packages to appropriately define the metal centre of the organometallic complexes. In this paper, some of the promising anticancer complexes of Ru(II) such as the rapta-based complexes formulated as [Ru(η6-p-cymene)L2(pta)] and those with unusual ligands are considered. CatB and kinases which have been experimentally confirmed as possible targets of the complexes are also predicted by the three methods as one of the most targeted receptors while TopII and HDAC7 are predicted by two and one of the methods as best targets. The interesting features of the binding of the complexes show that some of the complexes preferentially target specific macromolecules than the others, which is an indication of their specificity and possibility of their therapeutic combination without severe side effects that may come from competition for the same target. Also, introduction of unusual ligands is found to significantly improve the activities of most of the complexes studied. Strong correlations are observed for the predicted binding sites and the orientation of the complexes within the binding site by the three methods of docking. However there are disparities in the ranking of the complexes by the three method of docking, especially that of Glide.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBinding SitesComputational BiologyCoordination ComplexesCymenesGoldHumansLigandsMacromolecular SubstancesMolecular StructureMonoterpenesRuthenium4-cymeneAntineoplastic AgentsCoordination ComplexesCymenesGoldLigandsMacromolecular SubstancesMonoterpenesRuthenium

Identifiers

PMID23529035
PMCPMC6270031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.