Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23527851›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Preferences for a third-trimester ultrasound scan in a low-risk obstetric population: a discrete choice experiment.

Fiona A Lynn, Grainne E Crealey, Fiona A Alderdice, James C McElnay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona A LynnSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Grainne E CrealeyClinical Research Support Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Fiona A AlderdiceSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
James C McElnayClinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEstablish maternal preferences for a third-trimester ultrasound scan in a healthy, low-risk pregnant population.

designCross-sectional study incorporating a discrete choice experiment.

settingA large, urban maternity hospital in Northern Ireland.

participantsOne hundred and forty-six women in their second trimester of pregnancy.

methodsA discrete choice experiment was designed to elicit preferences for four attributes of a third-trimester ultrasound scan: health-care professional conducting the scan, detection rate for abnormal foetal growth, provision of non-medical information, cost. Additional data collected included age, marital status, socio-economic status, obstetric history, pregnancy-specific stress levels, perceived health and whether pregnancy was planned. Analysis was undertaken using a mixed logit model with interaction effects.

main outcome measuresWomen's preferences for, and trade-offs between, the attributes of a hypothetical scan and indirect willingness-to-pay estimates.

resultsWomen had significant positive preference for higher rate of detection, lower cost and provision of non-medical information, with no significant value placed on scan operator. Interaction effects revealed subgroups that valued the scan most: women experiencing their first pregnancy, women reporting higher levels of stress, an adverse obstetric history and older women.

conclusionsWomen were able to trade on aspects of care and place relative importance on clinical, non-clinical outcomes and processes of service delivery, thus highlighting the potential of using health utilities in the development of services from a clinical, economic and social perspective. Specifically, maternal preferences exhibited provide valuable information for designing a randomized trial of effectiveness and insight for clinical and policy decision makers to inform woman-centred care.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorObstetricsPatient PreferenceUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHospitals, MaternityHumansIrelandPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdRisk Factorsdiscrete choice experimentpregnancyultrasound scanwomen's preferences

Identifiers

PMID23527851
PMCPMC5060810
OpenAlexW2163920168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.