ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2013
Magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred method to assess treatment-related skeletal changes in children with brain tumors.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Growth plate abnormalities in pediatric cancer patients undergoing phase 1 anti-angiogenic therapy: a report from the Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2015Article
- Phase I trial, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of vandetanib and dasatinib in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the growing skeleton for potential altered skeletalgenesis associated with antiangiogenesis therapy. PATIENTS AND
methodsKnee radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were prospectively obtained on patients enrolled on two consecutive clinical trials using vandetanib, a potent oral (VEGF receptor 2) VEGFR-2 inhibitor alone or combined with dasatinib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG).
resultsFifty-nine patients (32 females) underwent 119 MRIs; 51 patients underwent 89 radiographs of the knees. The median age at enrollment was 6.2 years (range, 2.4-17.6 years). The dose of vandetanib ranged from 50 to 145 mg/m(2) /day. The median treatment duration was 205 days. Only two patients have not experienced disease progression after 18 and 60 months from diagnosis. MRI identified clinically significant premature physeal fusion in both knees of one patient, focal physeal thickening in one, osteonecrosis in eight patients (present at enrollment in one), and bony spicules crossing the physis in two patients (bilateral in one). MRI follow-up period averaged 5.3 months (range, 0-25.5 months; median, 3.5 months). Radiographs delineated normally fused physes in two patients but no cases of premature physeal fusion, osteonecrosis or bony spicules.
conclusionsAs MRI provided greater information than radiographs, and thus would be a more sensitive test to assess skeletalgenesis in pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.