Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23526445›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2013

Quantitative ultrasound image analysis of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients.

Karen Drukker, Maryellen Giger, Lina Arbash Meinel, Adam Starkey, Jyothi Janardanan, Hiroyuki Abe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen DrukkerUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, kdrukker@uchicago.edu.
Maryellen Giger
Lina Arbash Meinel
Adam Starkey
Jyothi Janardanan
Hiroyuki Abe

Funding

Variation in Hormone and xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme genes and breast cancerP50CA125183 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI COX, NANCY · 2006 to 2010
$11.3M
High-Performance Computer Cluster for Image AnalysisS10RR021039 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI NISHIKAWA, ROBERT M · 2007 to 2007
$230k
NCI NIH HHS P50-CA125183NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR021039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUltrasonography has the potential to accurately stage breast cancer with automated analysis to detect axillary lymph node metastasis. The aim of this study was to develop and test automated quantitative ultrasound image analysis of axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer staging.

methodsFollowing an IRB-approved HIPAA compliant protocol, ultrasound images of 90 breast cancer patients presenting for lymph node assessment were retrospectively collected. There were 51 node-positive and 39 node-negative patients, yielding images of 223 lymph nodes (109 positive for metastasis and 114 negative for metastasis). The analysis was completely automated apart from the manual indication of the approximate center of each lymph node. Mathematical descriptors of the nodes, which served as image-based biomarkers, were computer-extracted and input to a classifier for the task of distinguishing between positive (i.e., metastatic) and negative lymph nodes. The performance of this task was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with evaluation by-node and by-patient using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) as the performance metric.

resultsThe AUC was 0.85 (standard error 0.03) for by-node evaluation when distinguishing between positive and negative lymph nodes. The AUC was 0.87 (0.04) for patient-based prognosis, i.e., assessing whether patients were lymph node-positive or lymph node-negative.

conclusionBased on these classification results, we conclude that mathematical descriptors of sonographically imaged lymph nodes may be useful as prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer staging and demonstrate potential for predicting patient lymph node status.

Indexed as

AxillaBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.