ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2013
Advances in imaging of intracranial atherosclerotic disease and implications for treatment.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal imaging approach for the diagnosis of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD): Basic principles, current and future perspectives.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementIntracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is one of the most common causes of ischemic stroke worldwide and is associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke despite aggressive therapy. ICAD may lead to cerebral ischemia through a variety of mechanisms, the interactions of which are largely unknown. The use of endovascular therapy for the prevention of stroke related to severe ICAD has been studied but was associated with a higher risk of recurrent stroke and death in the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) study. With advances in diagnostic testing, it may be possible to better delineate the specific mechanism of stroke from ICAD and identify those patients at higher risk for recurrent ischemia. There may be a subset of patients less responsive to medical interventions, such as those with hemodynamic failure as opposed to those with perforator syndromes, who would benefit from medical plaque stabilization or safer endovascular approaches such as angioplasty alone. These will need to be tested in future clinical trials. Overall, symptomatic ICAD remains a high risk condition with suboptimal treatment options.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.