Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23525360›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2013

System analysis of spatial frequency domain imaging for quantitative mapping of surgically resected breast tissues.

Ashley M Laughney, Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy, Tyler B Rice, David J Cuccia, Richard J Barth, Bruce J Tromberg, Keith D Paulsen, Brian W Pogue, Wendy A Wells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review of structured light in diffuse optical imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2018
    Review
  12. Quantitative multispectralBiomedical optics express · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ashley M LaughneyDartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA. laughney.ashley@mgh.harvard.edu
Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy
Tyler B Rice
David J Cuccia
Richard J Barth
Bruce J Tromberg
Keith D Paulsen
Brian W Pogue
Wendy A Wells

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Joel E Milam · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Near Infrared Spectroscopy and ImagingP01CA080139 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI PAULSEN, KEITH D. · 1999 to 2010
$13.6M
Virtual Photonocs TechnologiesP41EB015890 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BOTVINICK, ELLIOT LAWRENCE · 2012 to 2017
$7.0M
A spatially-modulated scatter imaging system to detect tumor-associated stromaR21RR024411 · NCRR · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI WELLS, WENDY ANNE · 2009 to 2010
$397k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA080139NCI NIH HHS P01CA80139NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR024411NCRR NIH HHS R21RR024411NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015890NIBIB NIH HHS P41EB015890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The feasibility of spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) for breast surgical margin assessment was evaluated in tissue-simulating phantoms and in fully intact lumpectomy specimens at the time of surgery. Phantom data was evaluated according to contrast-detail resolution, quantitative accuracy and model-data goodness of fit, where optical parameters were estimated by minimizing the residual sum of squares between the measured modulation amplitude and its solutions, modeled according to diffusion and scaled-Monte Carlo simulations. In contrast-detail phantoms, a 1.25-mm-diameter surface inclusion was detectable for scattering contrast >28%; a fraction of this scattering contrast (7%) was detectable for a 10 mm surface inclusion and at least 33% scattering contrast was detected up to 1.5 mm below the phantom surface, a probing depth relevant to breast surgical margin assessment. Recovered hemoglobin concentrations were insensitive to changes in scattering, except for overestimation at visible wavelengths for total hemoglobin concentrations <15  μM. The scattering amplitude increased linearly with scattering concentration, but the scattering slope depended on both the particle size and number density. Goodness of fit was comparable for the diffusion and scaled-Monte Carlo models of transport in spatially modulated, near-infrared reflectance acquired from 47 lumpectomy tissues, but recovered absorption parameters varied more linearly with expected hemoglobin concentration in liquid phantoms for the scaled-Monte Carlo forward model. SFDI could potentially reduce the high secondary excision rate associated with breast conserving surgery; its clinical translation further requires reduced image reconstruction time and smart inking strategies.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, SegmentalAnimalsBreastBreast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodPhantoms, ImagingScattering, RadiationSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredSwine

Identifiers

PMID23525360
PMCPMC3605471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.