Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23523612›Full record

ArticleCancer letters2013

Selective biophysical interactions of surface modified nanoparticles with cancer cell lipids improve tumor targeting and gene therapy.

Blanka Sharma, Chiranjeevi Peetla, Isaac M Adjei, Vinod Labhasetwar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer letters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Inhibition of bone loss with surface-modulated, drug-loaded nanoparticles in an intraosseous model of prostate cancer.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Advancements in the delivery of epigenetic drugs.Expert opinion on drug delivery · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Blanka SharmaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Chiranjeevi Peetla
Isaac M Adjei
Vinod Labhasetwar
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Drug Resistance In Cancer TherapyR01CA149359 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI LABHASETWAR, VINOD D · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
Nuclear-targeted nanoparticles for gene deliveryR01EB003975 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI LABHASETWAR, VINOD D · 2005 to 2008
$1.1M
Role of Physical Properties in Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution and Tumor UptakeF31CA150566 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI ADJEI, ISAAC MORRIS · 2010 to 2012
$105k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA149359NCI NIH HHS 5F31CA150566NCI NIH HHS F31 CA150566NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149359NIBIB NIH HHS 1R01EB003975NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB003975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting gene- or drug-loaded nanoparticles (NPs) to tumors and ensuring their intratumoral retention after systemic administration remain key challenges to improving the efficacy of NP-based therapeutics. Here, we investigate a novel targeting approach that exploits changes in lipid metabolism and cell membrane biophysics that occur during malignancy. We hypothesized that modifications to the surface of NPs that preferentially increase their biophysical interaction with the membrane lipids of cancer cells will improve intratumoral retention and in vivo efficacy upon delivery of NPs loaded with a therapeutic gene. We have demonstrated that different surfactants, incorporated onto the NPs' surface, affect the biophysical interactions of NPs with the lipids of cancer cells and normal endothelial cells. NPs surface modified with didodecyldimethylammoniumbromide (DMAB) demonstrated greater interaction with cancer cell lipids, which was 6.7-fold greater than with unmodified NPs and 5.5-fold greater than with endothelial cell lipids. This correlated with increased uptake of DMAB-modified NPs with incubation time by cancer cells compared to other formulations of NPs and to uptake by endothelial cells. Upon systemic injection, DMAB-NPs demonstrated a 4.6-fold increase in tumor accumulation compared to unmodified NPs which also correlated to improved efficacy of p53 gene therapy. Characterization of the biophysical interactions between NPs and lipid membranes of tumors or other diseased tissues/organs may hold promise for engineering targeted delivery of therapeutics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysicsCell Line, TumorDNADrug Delivery SystemsGenes, p53Genetic TherapyHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsLipid MetabolismMaleMiceMice, NudeNanoparticlesPlasmidsProstatic NeoplasmsDNA

Identifiers

PMID23523612
PMCPMC3669664
OpenAlexW2135187129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.