Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23523533›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2013

In vivo response to dynamic hyaluronic acid hydrogels.

Jennifer L Young, Jeremy Tuler, Rebecca Braden, Pamela Schüp-Magoffin, Jacquelyn Schaefer, Kyle Kretchmer, Karen L Christman, Adam J Engler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Utilisation of Hydrogels for iPSC-Cardiomyocyte Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Engineering Gels with Time-Evolving Viscoelasticity.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. ModulatingJournal of materials chemistry. B · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L YoungDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Jeremy Tuler
Rebecca Braden
Pamela Schüp-Magoffin
Jacquelyn Schaefer
Kyle Kretchmer
Karen L Christman
Adam J Engler
University of California, San Diego · USCalifornia State University, San Marcos · USSanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine · US

Funding

Stem Cells and Dynamic Materials Improve Cardiac Function Post-mycardial InfarctiR21HL106529 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ENGLER, ADAM J · 2011 to 2012
$426k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL106529NHLBI NIH HHS R21HL106529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue-specific elasticity arises in part from developmental changes in extracellular matrix over time, e.g. ~10-fold myocardial stiffening in the chicken embryo. When this time-dependent stiffening has been mimicked in vitro with thiolated hyaluronic acid (HA-SH) hydrogels, improved cardiomyocyte maturation has been observed. However, host interactions, matrix polymerization, and the stiffening kinetics remain uncertain in vivo, and each plays a critical role in therapeutic applications using HA-SH. Hematological and histological analysis of subcutaneously injected HA-SH hydrogels showed minimal systemic immune response and host cell infiltration. Most importantly, subcutaneously injected HA-SH hydrogels exhibited time-dependent porosity and stiffness changes at a rate similar to hydrogels polymerized in vitro. When injected intramyocardially host cells begin to actively degrade HA-SH hydrogels within 1week post-injection, continuing this process while producing matrix to nearly replace the hydrogel within 1month post-injection. While non-thiolated HA did not degrade after injection into the myocardium, it also did not elicit an immune response, unlike HA-SH, where visible granulomas and macrophage infiltration were present 1month post-injection, likely due to reactive thiol groups. Altogether these data suggest that the HA-SH hydrogel responds appropriately in a less vascularized niche and stiffens as had been demonstrated in vitro, but in more vascularized tissues, in vivo applicability appears limited.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCells, CulturedElastic ModulusHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsInjections, IntramuscularMaterials TestingMyocytes, CardiacRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySulfhydryl CompoundsBiocompatible MaterialsHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsSulfhydryl Compounds

Identifiers

PMID23523533
PMCPMC3674107
OpenAlexW2033283863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.