Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23522654›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2013

New opportunities by synthetic biology for biopharmaceutical production in Pichia pastoris.

Thomas Vogl, Franz S Hartner, Anton Glieder

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BeyondChemical reviews · 2025
    Review
  4. EngineeringEngineering microbiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The advent of plant cells in bioreactors.Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Methanol biotransformation toward high-level production of fatty acid derivatives by engineering the industrial yeastProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Developing methylotrophic microbial platforms for a methanol-based bioindustry.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas VoglInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 14, Graz A-8010, Austria.
Franz S Hartner
Anton Glieder
Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (Austria) · ATBio Forschung Austria · ATInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopharmaceuticals are an integral part of modern medicine and pharmacy. Both, the development and the biotechnological production of biopharmaceuticals are highly cost-intensive and require suitable expression systems. In this review we discuss established and emerging tools for reengineering the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris for biopharmaceutical production. Recent advancements of this industrial expression system through synthetic biology include synthetic promoters to avoid methanol induction and to fine-tune protein production. New platform strains and molecular cloning tools as well as in vivo glycoengineering to produce humanized glycoforms have made P. pastoris an important host for biopharmaceutical production.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological ProductsBiotechnologyGlycoproteinsGlycosylationHumansMethanolPichiaPromoter Regions, GeneticSynthetic BiologyBiological ProductsGlycoproteinsMethanol

Identifiers

PMID23522654
PMCPMC3841573
OpenAlexW1991656269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.