Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23522296›Full record

ReviewUrology2013

Challenges in the pathology of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a dialogue between the urologic surgeon and the pathologist.

Donna E Hansel, Jeremy S Miller, Michael S Cookson, Sam S Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Donna E HanselCleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. hanseld@ccf.org
Jeremy S Miller
Michael S Cookson
Sam S Chang

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandKL2TR000440 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$11.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000440NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 70%-80% of urothelial carcinomas are detected at the stage of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Initial management is often successful, but recurrence is common and leads to a long, burdensome, costly disease course. The quality and efficiency of care depends in part on accurate, clearly communicated descriptions of tumor characteristics. This review identifies current best practices, unmet needs, and key issues in the pathology of NMIBC for the practicing urologist. Reasonable and objective recommendations are provided with the goal of improving urologist-pathologist communication, the efficiency of healthcare utilization, and outcomes for patients with NMIBC.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationPathologyUrologyCarcinomaHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessPatient Care TeamSpecimen HandlingUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID23522296
PMCPMC5224832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.