Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23522245›Full record

Trial reportBMC cardiovascular disorders2013

Targets and self-management for the control of blood pressure in stroke and at risk groups (TASMIN-SR): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Claire O'Brien, Emma P Bray, Stirling Bryan, Sheila M Greenfield, M Sayeed Haque, F D Richard Hobbs, Miren I Jones, Sue Jowett, Billingsley Kaambwa, Paul Little and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Patients' and clinicians' views on the optimum schedules for self-monitoring of blood pressure: a qualitative focus group and interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  6. Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.European cardiology · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Claire O'BrienPrimary Care Clinical Sciences, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Emma P Bray
Stirling Bryan
Sheila M Greenfield
M Sayeed Haque
F D Richard Hobbs
Miren I Jones
Sue Jowett
Billingsley Kaambwa
Paul Little
Jonathan Mant
Cristina Penaloza
Claire Schwartz
Helen Shackleford
Jinu Varghese
Bryan Williams
Richard J McManus

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1153Medical Research Council MC_PC_13090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-monitoring of hypertension with self-titration of antihypertensives (self-management) results in lower systolic blood pressure for at least one year. However, few people in high risk groups have been evaluated to date and previous work suggests a smaller effect size in these groups. This trial therefore aims to assess the added value of self-management in high risk groups over and above usual care. METHODS/

designThe targets and self-management for the control of blood pressure in stroke and at risk groups (TASMIN-SR) trial will be a pragmatic primary care based, unblinded, randomised controlled trial of self-management of blood pressure (BP) compared to usual care. Eligible patients will have a history of stroke, coronary heart disease, diabetes or chronic kidney disease and will be recruited from primary care. Participants will be individually randomised to either usual care or self-management. The primary outcome of the trial will be difference in office SBP between intervention and control groups at 12 months adjusted for baseline SBP and covariates. 540 patients will be sufficient to detect a difference in SBP between self-management and usual care of 5 mmHg with 90% power. Secondary outcomes will include self-efficacy, lifestyle behaviours, health-related quality of life and adverse events. An economic analysis will consider both within trial costs and a model extrapolating the results thereafter. A qualitative analysis will gain insights into patients' views, experiences and decision making processes. DISCUSSION: The results of the trial will be directly applicable to primary care in the UK. If successful, self-management of blood pressure in people with stroke and other high risk conditions would be applicable to many hundreds of thousands of individuals in the UK and beyond.

trial registrationISRCTN87171227.

Indexed as

Research DesignSelf CareAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug CostsHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHypertensionPredictive Value of TestsPrimary Health CareRisk FactorsRisk Reduction BehaviorAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23522245
PMCPMC3623796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.