Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23522152›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Procalcitonin, pyuria and proadrenomedullin in the management of urinary tract infections--'triple p in uti': study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Daniel Drozdov, Anja Thomer, Marc Meili, Stefanie Schwarz, Rita Bossart Kouegbe, Katharina Regez, Merih Guglielmetti, Ursula Schild, Antoinette Conca, Petra Schäfer and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel DrozdovMedical University Department, University of Basel, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, Aarau 5001, Switzerland.
Anja Thomer
Marc Meili
Stefanie Schwarz
Rita Bossart Kouegbe
Katharina Regez
Merih Guglielmetti
Ursula Schild
Antoinette Conca
Petra Schäfer
Barbara Reutlinger
Cornelia Ottiger
Florian Buchkremer
Alexander Litke
Philipp Schuetz
Andreas Huber
Ulrich Bürgi
Christoph A Fux
Andreas Bock
Beat Müller
Werner C Albrich
Triple P study group
Kantonsspital Aarau · CHUniversity of Basel · CHKantonsspital St. Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infectious diseases and drivers of antibiotic use and in-hospital days. A reduction of antibiotic use potentially lowers the risk of antibiotic resistance. An early and adequate risk assessment combining medical, biopsychosocial and functional risk scores has the potential to optimize site-of-care decisions and thus allocation of limited health-care resources. The aim of this factorial design study is twofold: first, for Intervention A, it investigates antibiotic exposure of patients treated with a protocol based on the type of UTI, procalcitonin (PCT) and pyuria. Second, for Intervention B, it investigates the usefulness of the prognostic biomarker proadrenomedullin (ProADM) integrated into an interdisciplinary assessment bundle for site-of-care decisions. METHODS AND

designThis randomized controlled open-label trial has a factorial design (2 × 2). Randomization of patients will be based on a pre-specified computer-generated randomization list and independent for the two interventions. Adults with UTI presenting to the emergency department (ED) will be screened and enrolled after providing informed consent. For our first Intervention (A), we developed a protocol based on previous observational research to recommend initiation and duration of antibiotic use based on the clinical presentation of UTI, pyuria and PCT levels. For our second intervention (B), an algorithm was developed to support site-of care decisions based on the prognostic marker ProADM and distinct nursing factors on days 1 and 3. Both interventions will be compared with a control group conforming to the guidelines. The primary endpoints for the two interventions will be: (A) overall exposure to antibiotics and (B) length of physician-led hospitalization within a follow-up of 30 days. Endpoints are assessed at discharge from hospital, and 30 and 90 days after admission. We plan to screen 300 patients and enroll 250 for an anticipated estimated loss of follow-up of 20%. This will provide adequate power for the two interventions. DISCUSSION: This trial investigates two strategies for improved individualized medical care in patients with UTI. The minimally effective duration of antibiotic therapy is not known for UTIs, which is important for reducing the selection pressure for antibiotic resistance, costs and drug-related side effects. Triage decisions must be improved to reflect the true medical, biopsychosocial and functional risks in order to allocate patients to the most appropriate care setting and reduce hospital-acquired disability.

trial registrationTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13663741.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdrenomedullinAlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideClinical ProtocolsEmergency Service, HospitalGuideline AdherenceHumansLength of StayPatient AdmissionPatient DischargePractice Guidelines as TopicPrecision MedicineAdrenomedullinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideproadrenomedullinProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID23522152
PMCPMC3614534
OpenAlexW2145023476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.