Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23522088›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2013

Snail1 expression in colorectal cancer and its correlation with clinical and pathological parameters.

Feride Kroepil, Georg Fluegen, Daniel Vallböhmer, Stephan E Baldus, Levent Dizdar, Andreas M Raffel, Dieter Hafner, Nikolas H Stoecklein, Wolfram T Knoefel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Snail Expression as a Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. High expression ofGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Feride KroepilDepartment of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany. Feride.Kroepil@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
Georg Fluegen
Daniel Vallböhmer
Stephan E Baldus
Levent Dizdar
Andreas M Raffel
Dieter Hafner
Nikolas H Stoecklein
Wolfram T Knoefel
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnail1 is a transcription regulator of E-cadherin. The loss of E-cadherin seems to be a crucial step in the process of Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). EMT initiates invasion and proliferation in many tumours. Overexpression of Snail1 is known to be associated with poor outcome in several solid tumours. The aim of this study was to analyse its expression profile and prognostic significance in colorectal cancer.

methodsTissue microarrays (TMA) containing paraffin-embedded primary colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue samples from 251 patients were used in this study. The expression of Snail1 and E-cadherin was assessed by immunohistochemistry in different tumour compartments, corresponding lymph node metastases and normal colonic mucosa. Intensity of staining was classified according to the Remmele score (standardized scoring system) as well as the semiquantitative score established by Blechschmidt et al.

resultsSnail1 expression was observed in 76% of the CRC. Loss of E-cadherin was noted in 87% of the CRC. Snail1 positive tumours were significantly correlated with Snail1 positive lymph node metastases (p=0.03). There was no significant correlation between loss of E-cadherin and Snail1 expression, or between N-stage or grading and Snail1 expression. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis identified no prognostic impact of Snail1 expression on overall survival.

conclusionSnail1 expression was detectable in most of the CRC but showed no significant association with E-cadherin loss, clinical pathological characteristics or overall survival. The observed loss of E-cadherin could be explained by effects of other important EMT pathways, such as the Wnt-signalling cascade.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCadherinsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGene ExpressionHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSnail Family Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsCadherinsSNAI1 protein, humanSnail Family Transcription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23522088
PMCPMC3617032
OpenAlexW1984609028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.