ArticleDeveloping world bioethics2013
Field workers at the interface.
Article in Developing world bioethics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review on ethical challenges of 'field' research in low-income and middle-income countries: respect, justice and beneficence for research staff?BMJ global health · 2021Pooled it
- "The most stress comes from witnessing the abuse of children" -challenges faced by research assistants in community-based research in Mtwara, Tanzania.BMC public health · 2026Article
- A vision for reinvigorating global mental health.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Considering Risks to Researchers and Staff in Low-Resource Settings during Public Health Crises: A Proposed Conceptual Model.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The hidden emotional labour behind ensuring the social value of research: Experiences of frontline health policy and systems researchers based in Kenya during COVID-19.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- 'Working relationships' across difference - a realist review of community engagement with malaria research.Wellcome open research · 2022Review
- The ethical implications of verbal autopsy: responding to emotional and moral distress.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Model for developing context-sensitive responses to vulnerability in research: managing ethical dilemmas faced by frontline research staff in Kenya.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Scoping review of Neglected Tropical Disease Interventions and Health Promotion: A framework for successful NTD interventions as evidenced by the literature.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Article
- Dilemmas of Ethics in Practice in Longitudinal Health Research: Identifying Opportunities for Widening Participation of Residents.Frontiers in sociology · 2019Article
- The 'Drug Bag' method: lessons from anthropological studies of antibiotic use in Africa and South-East Asia.Global health action · 2019Article
- "Not just dogs, but rabid dogs": tensions and conflicts amongst research volunteers in Malawi.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2018Article
- Supporting the role of community members employed as research staff: Perspectives of community researchers working in addiction research.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2017Article
- Perceptions of community-based field workers on the effect of a longitudinal biomedical research project on their sustainable livelihoods.BMC public health · 2017Article
- The 'experimental public' in longitudinal health research: views of local leaders and service providers in rural South Africa.Global health research and policy · 2017Article
- Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice.BMJ global health · 2017Article
- Neglected Actors in Neglected Tropical Diseases Research: Historical Perspectives on Health Workers and Contemporary Buruli Ulcer Research in Ayos, Cameroon.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016Article
- Enhancing quality and integrity in biomedical research in Africa: an international call for greater focus, investment and standardisation in capacity strengthening for frontline staff.BMC medical ethics · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.