Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23520532›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Harnessing clinical psychiatric data with an electronic assessment tool (OPCRIT+): the utility of symptom dimensions.

Philip James Brittain, Sarah Elizabeth Margaret Lobo, James Rucker, Myanthi Amarasinghe, Anantha Padmanabha Pillai Anilkumar, Martin Baggaley, Pallavi Banerjee, Jenny Bearn, Matthew Broadbent, Matthew Butler and 28 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

Philip James BrittainNational Institute for Health Research Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Philip.Brittain@kcl.ac.uk
Sarah Elizabeth Margaret Lobo
James Rucker
Myanthi Amarasinghe
Anantha Padmanabha Pillai Anilkumar
Martin Baggaley
Pallavi Banerjee
Jenny Bearn
Matthew Broadbent
Matthew Butler
Colin Donald Campbell
Anthony James Cleare
Luiz Dratcu
Sophia Frangou
Fiona Gaughran
Matthew Goldin
Annika Henke
Nikola Kern
Abdallah Krayem
Faiza Mufti
Ronan McIvor
Humphrey Needham-Bennett
Stuart Newman
Dele Olajide
David O'Flynn
Ranga Rao
Ijaz Ur Rehman
Gertrude Seneviratne
Daniel Stahl
Sajid Suleman
Janet Treasure
John Tully
David Veale
Robert Stewart
Peter McGuffin
Simon Lovestone
Matthew Hotopf
Gunter Schumann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in personalised psychiatry is dependent on researchers having access to systematic and accurately acquired symptom data across clinical diagnoses. We have developed a structured psychiatric assessment tool, OPCRIT+, that is being introduced into the electronic medical records system of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust which can help to achieve this. In this report we examine the utility of the symptom data being collected with the tool. Cross-sectional mental state data from a mixed-diagnostic cohort of 876 inpatients was subjected to a principal components analysis (PCA). Six components, explaining 46% of the variance in recorded symptoms, were extracted. The components represented dimensions of mania, depression, positive symptoms, anxiety, negative symptoms and disorganization. As indicated by component scores, different clinical diagnoses demonstrated distinct symptom profiles characterized by wide-ranging levels of severity. When comparing the predictive value of symptoms against diagnosis for a variety of clinical outcome measures (e.g. 'Overactive, aggressive behaviour'), symptoms proved superior in five instances (R(2) range: 0.06-0.28) whereas diagnosis was best just once (R(2):0.25). This report demonstrates that symptom data being routinely gathered in an NHS trust, when documented on the appropriate tool, have considerable potential for onward use in a variety of clinical and research applications via representation as dimensions of psychopathology.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersAdultCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID23520532
PMCPMC3592827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.