Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23520505›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

A step forward in molecular diagnostics of lyssaviruses--results of a ring trial among European laboratories.

Melina Fischer, Kerstin Wernike, Conrad M Freuling, Thomas Müller, Orhan Aylan, Bernard Brochier, Florence Cliquet, Sonia Vázquez-Morón, Peter Hostnik, Anita Huovilainen and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Real-Time RT-PCR for the Detection of Lyssavirus Species.Journal of veterinary medicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 12 institutions in 11 countries.

Melina FischerInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Kerstin Wernike
Conrad M Freuling
Thomas Müller
Orhan Aylan
Bernard Brochier
Florence Cliquet
Sonia Vázquez-Morón
Peter Hostnik
Anita Huovilainen
Mats Isaksson
Engbert A Kooi
Jean Mooney
Mihai Turcitu
Thomas B Rasmussen
Sandra Revilla-Fernández
Marcin Smreczak
Anthony R Fooks
Denise A Marston
Martin Beer
Bernd Hoffmann
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GBFinnish Food Authority · FIInstitute for Diagnosis and Animal Health · ROInstitute of Molecular Biology · DEInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstitut Scientifique de Santé Publique · BENational Veterinary Research Institute · PLSwedish Veterinary Agency · SETechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATVeterinary Research Institute · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies is a lethal and notifiable zoonotic disease for which diagnostics have to meet the highest standards. In recent years, an evolution was especially seen in molecular diagnostics with a wide variety of different detection methods published. Therefore, a first international ring trial specifically designed on the use of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of lyssavirus genomic RNA was organized. The trial focussed on assessment and comparison of the performance of conventional and real-time assays. In total, 16 European laboratories participated. All participants were asked to investigate a panel of defined lyssavirus RNAs, consisting of Rabies virus (RABV) and European bat lyssavirus 1 and 2 (EBLV-1 and -2) RNA samples, with systems available in their laboratory. The ring trial allowed the important conclusion that conventional RT-PCR assays were really robust assays tested with a high concordance between different laboratories and assays. The real-time RT-PCR system by Wakeley et al. (2005) in combination with an intercalating dye, and the combined version by Hoffmann and co-workers (2010) showed good sensitivity for the detection of all RABV samples included in this test panel. Furthermore, all used EBLV-specific assays, real-time RT-PCRs as well as conventional RT-PCR systems, were shown to be suitable for a reliable detection of EBLVs. It has to be mentioned that differences were seen in the performance between both the individual RT-PCR systems and the laboratories. Laboratories which used more than one molecular assay for testing the sample panel always concluded a correct sample result. Due to the markedly high genetic diversity of lyssaviruses, the application of different assays in diagnostics is needed to achieve a maximum of diagnostic accuracy. To improve the knowledge about the diagnostic performance proficiency testing at an international level is recommended before using lyssavirus molecular diagnostics e.g. for confirmatory testing.

Indexed as

Rhabdoviridae InfectionsAnimalsEuropeFemaleHumansLyssavirusMaleReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificityRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID23520505
PMCPMC3592807
OpenAlexW2073331236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.