Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23520486›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Utilization of quantitative in vivo pharmacology approaches to assess combination effects of everolimus and irinotecan in mouse xenograft models of colorectal cancer.

Erica L Bradshaw-Pierce, Todd M Pitts, Gillian Kulikowski, Heather Selby, Andrea L Merz, Daniel L Gustafson, Natalie J Serkova, S Gail Eckhardt, Colin D Weekes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessment of non-linear combination effect terms for drug-drug interactions.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Treated with Sorafenib Monotherapy vs. Sorafenib-Everolimus Combination Therapy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Erica L Bradshaw-PierceDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America. Erica.Pierce@ucdenver.edu
Todd M Pitts
Gillian Kulikowski
Heather Selby
Andrea L Merz
Daniel L Gustafson
Natalie J Serkova
S Gail Eckhardt
Colin D Weekes
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USColorado State University · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · US

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently dysregulated in cancers and inhibition of mTOR has demonstrated the ability to modulate pro-survival pathways. As such, we sought to determine the ability of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus to potentiate the antitumor effects of irinotecan in colorectal cancer (CRC). EXPERIMENTAL

designThe combinatorial effects of everolimus and irinotecan were evaluated in vitro and in vivo in CRC cell lines harboring commonly found mutations in PIK3CA, KRAS and/or BRAF. Pharmacokinetically-directed dosing protocols of everolimus and irinotecan were established and used to assess the in vivo antitumor effects of the agents. At the end of treatment, 3-6 tumors per treatment arm were harvested for biomarker analysis by NMR metabolomics.

resultsEverolimus and irinotecan/SN38 demonstrated synergistic anti-proliferative effects in multiple CRC cell lines in vitro. Combination effects of everolimus and irinotecan were determined in CRC xenograft models using clinically-relevant dosing protocols. Everolimus demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition alone and when combined with irinotecan in HT29 and HCT116 tumor xenografts. Metabolomic analysis showed that HT29 tumors were more metabolically responsive than HCT116 tumors. Everolimus caused a decrease in glycolysis in both tumor types whilst irinotecan treatment resulted in a profound accumulation of lipids in HT29 tumors indicating a cytotoxic effect.

conclusionsQuantitative analysis of tumor growth and metabolomic data showed that the combination of everolimus and irinotecan was more beneficial in the BRAF/PIK3CA mutant HT29 tumor xenografts, which had an additive effect, than the KRAS/PIK3CA mutant HCT116 tumor xenografts, which had a less than additive effect.

Indexed as

Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinCell Line, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesColonic NeoplasmsDrug SynergismEverolimusFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIrinotecanMetabolomeMiceMice, NudeAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBRAF protein, humanCamptothecinClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesEverolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsIrinotecanKRAS protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID23520486
PMCPMC3592886
OpenAlexW2064697737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.