Trial reportPloS one2013
Family preference for place of death mediates the relationship between patient preference and actual place of death: a nationwide retrospective cross-sectional study.
Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preferred Place of Death in Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Pooled it
- Relationship Between the Preferred Place of Death in Patients' Health Records and the Actual Location of Death in Home Palliative Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Social factors affecting home-based end-of-life care for patients with cancer and primary caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Effects of Caregiver's Gender or Distance Between Caregiver and Patient's Home on Home Discharge from Hospital in 285 Patients Aged ≥75 Years in Japan.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Association between immigrant status and advanced cancer patients' location and quality of death.Cancer · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of Filial Piety Representations at Parents' End of Life Scale.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Preferred place of death and end-of-life care for adult cancer patients in Iran: A cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Impact on place of death in cancer patients: a causal exploration in southern Switzerland.BMC palliative care · 2020Article
- Article
- Perspectives of bereaved relatives of patients with haematological malignancies concerning preferred place of care and death: A qualitative study.Palliative medicine · 2019Article
- Thai medical students' attitudes regarding what constitutes a "good death": a multi-center study.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- Determinants of aggregate length of hospital stay in the last year of life in Switzerland.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Factors related to the provision of home-based end-of-life care among home-care nursing, home help, and care management agencies in Japan.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- Preference of the place of death among people of pune.Indian journal of palliative care · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiscrepancy between preferred and actual place of death is common in cancer patients. While previous research has elucidated the factors associated with congruence between patients' preferred and actual place of death, it is not known how the perspective of the family influences the place of death. This study examined whether family preference for place of death mediates the relationship between patient preference and actual place of death.
methodsA total of 258 cancer patients (home death, n = 142; hospital death, n = 116) who had received terminal care in Japan were analyzed. Measures included patients' demographic variables, patient and family preferences for place for death, actual place of death, patients' functional status, use and intensity of home care, availability of inpatient bed, living arrangement, and amount of extended family support.
resultsPatient-family congruence on preferred place of death was 66% in patients who died at home and 47% in patients who died at other places (kappa coefficient: 0.20 and 0.25, respectively). In a multiple logistic regression model, patients were more likely to die at home when patients were male (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.53, 1.06-6.05) and when their family preferred death at home (OR, 95% CI: 37.37, 13.82-101.03). A Sobel test revealed that family preference mediated the relationship between patient preference and place of death (p<0.05).
conclusionsThis study is, to our knowledge, the first to unveil the role of the family in the relationship between patient preference and place of death in Japan. In order to honor patients' wishes to die at home, supporting caregivers in the family may be an essential component of terminal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.