Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23520130›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology journal2013

The role of single-cell analyses in understanding cell lineage commitment.

Tyler M Gibson, Charles A Gersbach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Single-molecule analysis of myocyte differentiation reveals bimodal lineage commitment.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tyler M GibsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0281, USA.
Charles A Gersbach

Funding

University Training Program in Biomolecular & Tissue EngineeringT32GM008555 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GERSBACH, CHARLES A. · 1994 to 2021
$8.1M
Engineering Morphogenetic Factors for Enhanced Genetic ReprogrammingDP2OD008586 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GERSBACH, CHARLES A. · 2011 to 2011
$2.4M
Spatially Controlled Gene Delivery of Morphogenetic Factors from Woven ScaffoldsR03AR061042 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GERSBACH, CHARLES A. · 2011 to 2013
$224k
NIAMS NIH HHS R03 AR061042NIAMS NIH HHS R03AR061042NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008555NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM008555NIH HHS DP2 OD008586NIH HHS DP2OD008586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of cell lineage commitment is critical for improving our understanding of tissue development and regeneration, and for realizing stem cell-based therapies and engineered tissue replacements. Recently, the discovery of an unanticipated degree of variability in fundamental biological processes, including divergent responses of genetically identical cells to various stimuli, has provided mechanistic insight into cellular decision making and the collective behavior of cell populations. Therefore, the study of lineage commitment with single-cell resolution could provide greater knowledge of cellular differentiation mechanisms and the influence of noise on cellular processes. This will require the adoption of new technologies for single-cell analysis as traditional methods typically measure average values of bulk population behavior. This review discusses the recent developments in methods for analyzing the behavior of individual cells, and how these approaches are leading to a deeper understanding and better control of cellular decision making.

Indexed as

Cell LineageAnimalsHumansRegenerative MedicineSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23520130
PMCPMC3753774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.