Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23519976›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2013

Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures: a systematic review.

M A C Van Son, J De Vries, J A Roukema, B L Den Oudsten

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessment of Patients' Quality of Life during Conservative Treatment after Distal Radius Fracture.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Trajectories in quality of life of patients with a fracture of the distal radius or ankle using latent class analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  9. The course of health status and (health-related) quality of life following fracture of the lower extremity: a 6-month follow-up study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Health-related quality of life in women referred for bone density assessment: relationships with bone mineral density, fracture and co-morbidity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M A C Van SonCoRPS, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, Tilburg, 5000 LE, The Netherlands, m.a.c.vanson@tilburguniversity.edu.
J De Vries
J A Roukema
B L Den Oudsten

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDistal radius fractures (DRF) cause long-term functional limitations. A subgroup (21.2 %) will never fully recover after DRF. Therefore, it is important to consider the health status (HS) and (health-related) quality of life (HR)QOL of these patients. The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) the HS and (HR)QOL outcomes following DRF, (2) sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with HS and (HR)QOL, and to (3) evaluate the conceptualization of HS and (HR)QOL in these studies.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO (January 1976-July 2012). A criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies.

resultsTwenty-six studies were included with a mean quality score of 7.7 (SD = 1.7). The majority of studies had a low methodological quality. Twenty-three studies (88.5 %) focused exclusively on HS and only three studies examined (HR)QOL. However, 34.8 % of the outcomes were labeled as (HR)QOL by the authors, while in fact, HS was assessed. Sex, age, educational level, living situation, and radiocarpal arthritis were associated with HS. In general, no differences were found in HS and (HR)QOL when comparing different treatment modalities.

conclusionsThe focus of outcome research in DRF is mainly on HS instead of (HR)QOL. HS instruments were often mislabeled as (HR)QOL instruments. With inconclusive results of mostly low-quality studies, there is a need for high-quality prospective follow-up studies measuring HS and/or (HR)QOL while using the correct terminology.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleRadius FracturesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.