Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23519975›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2013

Changing values, changing outcomes: the influence of reprioritization response shift on outcome assessment after spine surgery.

Carolyn E Schwartz, Tolulope T Sajobi, Lisa M Lix, Brian R Quaranto, Joel A Finkelstein

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Long-term (> 10 years) clinical outcomes of instrumented posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distinguishing appraisal and personality influences on quality of life in chronic illness: introducing the quality-of-life Appraisal Profile version 2.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Response shift and disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  11. Evaluating quality of life and response shift from a couple-based perspective: a study among patients with colorectal cancer and their partners.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  12. Health-related quality of life in women referred for bone density assessment: relationships with bone mineral density, fracture and co-morbidity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  13. Identifying reprioritization response shift in a stroke caregiver population: a comparison of missing data methods.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Observational
  14. Guidelines for secondary analysis in search of response shift.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2013
    Article
  15. Life satisfaction in adult survivors of childhood brain tumors.Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolyn E SchwartzDeltaQuest Foundation, Inc., 31 Mitchell Road, Concord, MA, 01742, USA, carolyn.schwartz@deltaquest.org.
Tolulope T Sajobi
Lisa M Lix
Brian R Quaranto
Joel A Finkelstein
DeltaQuest Foundation (United States) · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen patients experience a substantial health state change, they may undergo changes in the underlying meaning of their self-report to standardized outcome measures. These response shifts can reflect changes in the patient's internal standards, values or conceptualization of quality of life. We investigated the presence of changing values (reprioritization response shift) in a longitudinal cohort of spine surgery patients.

methodsSpinal decompression surgery patients (mean age 52 years; 39 % female, 36 % working) provided visual analogue scale (VAS) back and leg pain items, the Short-Form-36 (SF-36v1), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) data pre- and post-surgery (n pre = 169; n 6weeks = 102; n 3months = 106; n 6months = 68). Improved and No-Effect patient groups were compared using the VAS minimally important difference (±15 points) as a cutoff. Reprioritization response shift detection was based on change in the relative importance of the SF-36 domains for group discrimination pre- and post-surgery.

resultsThe Improved group evidenced significant post-surgery differences from the No-Effect group on bodily pain, general health, physical functioning, social functioning, vitality, and the ODI. The relative importance analysis showed a differential effect with bodily pain (p < 0.01) and physical functioning (p < 0.05) becoming more important, and role physical (p < 0.01) becoming less important post-surgery in distinguishing the Improved group as compared to the No-Effect group. The Improved patients also evidenced stronger associations between bodily pain and physical functioning, vitality and general health (p < 0.05). The No-Effect group evidenced increased inter-correlations of bodily pain with social functioning, mental health, and general health (p < 0.05).

conclusionsPatients who report clinically significant change in leg and back pain post-surgery using VAS pain scores are also distinguished by increased importance of bodily pain and physical functioning, and decreased importance of role physical. Bodily pain is primarily reflective of physical item response post-surgery among Improved patients, but reflects physical, social, and emotional item response among No-Effect patients. These changes in values may reflect a "moving goal post" in outcome assessment that complicates the interpretation of mean differences over time on standard spine outcome measures.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBack PainDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLongitudinal StudiesLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPainPain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID23519975
OpenAlexW2050053970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.